Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers a noticeable edge in demanding tasks, and the 50W wired charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Mate 30 Pro’s excellent battery endurance and unique camera capabilities still hold appeal.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 30 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 19. Released 2019, September 26 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.1 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1176 x 2400 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@960fps, 720p@7680fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 27W wireless Reverse wireless | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | LIO-L09, LIO-L29, LIO-AL00, LIO-TL00 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 1290 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 378950 (v7), 484529 (v8) GeekBench: 11936 (v4.4), 3038 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (103h)
- Unique and cinematic camera aesthetic
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Lower peak display brightness
- Slightly slower performance compared to Snapdragon 865
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Faster performance with Snapdragon 865
- Significantly faster 50W wired charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slightly lower battery endurance (101h)
- Potentially more aggressive image processing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature 'Infinite' contrast ratio displays, typical of OLED panels. However, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display at 858 nits measured, compared to the Mate 30 Pro’s 686 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both offer excellent color reproduction, the higher peak brightness of the Mi 10 Pro provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, particularly for HDR content. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device is a notable omission by today's standards, but was common for flagships at the time.
Camera Comparison
Both phones excel in photography, but approach it differently. While detailed sensor specs are unavailable in the provided data, both devices offer versatile camera systems. The Mate 30 Pro is known for its cinematic video capabilities and unique color science, prioritizing a more artistic and less 'processed' look. The Mi 10 Pro, leveraging Qualcomm’s image signal processor, tends towards more vibrant and saturated images. The Mi 10 Pro’s 5G modem integration also allows for faster uploads of high-resolution photos and videos. Without detailed sensor information, a definitive camera winner is difficult to declare, but the Mi 10 Pro’s processing pipeline offers greater flexibility for post-processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Huawei’s Kirin 990 (7nm) versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+). The Snapdragon 865, utilizing a slightly refined process node and a newer Cortex-A77 core, generally outperforms the Kirin 990 in CPU-intensive tasks and GPU benchmarks. The Mi 10 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a more balanced approach to sustained performance compared to the Mate 30 Pro’s (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76, 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76, 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55). While both utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the Snapdragon 865’s superior architecture provides a smoother experience during demanding gaming sessions and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 30 Pro edges out the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro in endurance, achieving a measured 103 hours versus 101 hours. This slight advantage is likely due to the Kirin 990’s more efficient power management. However, the Mi 10 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging: 50W wired (with PD3.0 support) versus 40W on the Mate 30 Pro. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time. The Mi 10 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, exceeding the Mate 30 Pro’s 27W. While the Mate 30 Pro boasts reverse wireless charging, the Mi 10 Pro’s faster wired and wireless charging speeds provide a more practical benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 30 Pro if you prioritize exceptional battery life and a distinct, cinematic camera aesthetic. Its 103-hour endurance rating is ideal for heavy users who frequently travel or lack consistent access to power. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you demand the fastest possible performance for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 50W wired charging. It’s the better choice for power users and those invested in the Qualcomm ecosystem.