Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs. Sony Xperia 1 III: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Camera
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Huawei Mate 30 Pro remains a compelling choice thanks to its exceptional 103-hour endurance rating. However, power users and content creators will find the Sony Xperia 1 III’s Snapdragon 888 chipset and refined feature set more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 30 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 19. Released 2019, September 26 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.1 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 min) | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1176 x 2400 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@960fps, 720p@7680fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 27W wireless Reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | LIO-L09, LIO-L29, LIO-AL00, LIO-TL00 | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | About 1290 EUR | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 378950 (v7), 484529 (v8) GeekBench: 11936 (v4.4), 3038 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (103h endurance)
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Strong low-light camera performance (likely)
- Older chipset (Kirin 990)
- Potentially limited software support
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Professional-grade camera features
- 21:9 display for content creation
- Shorter battery life (82h endurance)
- Slower 30W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Huawei Mate 30 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 686 nits, while the Sony Xperia 1 III reaches 620 nits. While the Mate 30 Pro is brighter, both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. The Xperia 1 III’s 6.1-inch display, however, is geared towards content creators with its 21:9 aspect ratio, offering a wider canvas for video editing and viewing. The lack of detailed refresh rate information for the Mate 30 Pro means the Xperia 1 III likely offers a smoother experience, assuming it supports a higher refresh rate (which is standard for the Xperia 1 III series).
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but their approaches differ. While both are capable of photo and video, detailed sensor information is missing. The Xperia 1 III’s camera system is geared towards professional photographers, offering extensive manual controls and real-time tracking autofocus. The Mate 30 Pro, known for its low-light performance, likely relies heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Xperia 1 III’s focus on manual control and advanced features gives it an edge for experienced photographers.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Huawei’s Kirin 990 (7nm) versus Sony’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The Snapdragon 888, built on a smaller 5nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 7nm Kirin 990. The Xperia 1 III’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X1 prime core alongside Cortex-A78 performance cores – provides a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. While the Mate 30 Pro’s octa-core CPU is capable, the Snapdragon 888’s Adreno 660 GPU significantly outperforms the Mali-G76 MP16 in the Mate 30 Pro, making the Xperia 1 III the clear winner for gaming.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 30 Pro’s 103-hour endurance rating is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Sony Xperia 1 III’s 82-hour rating. This translates to considerably longer battery life in real-world usage. The Mate 30 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 40W, compared to the Xperia 1 III’s 30W with PD and 50% charge in 30 minutes. Both support wireless and reverse wireless charging, but the Mate 30 Pro’s superior endurance and faster wired charging make it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 30 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and if camera versatility is paramount. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prefer a phone with top-tier processing power for gaming and demanding applications, and if you value a more professional-grade camera experience with manual controls.