Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs. Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Battery, Performance, and Display
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Huawei Mate 30 Pro wins with its impressive 103-hour endurance rating. However, those who value rapid replenishment and the latest Snapdragon chipset will find the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W charging and Snapdragon 865 a more compelling package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 30 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, September 19. Released 2019, September 26 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.1 x 73.1 x 8.8 mm (6.22 x 2.88 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 2m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1176 x 2400 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~94.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@960fps, 720p@7680fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired 27W wireless Reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Space Silver, Cosmic Purple, Emerald Green | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | LIO-L09, LIO-L29, LIO-AL00, LIO-TL00 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 1290 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 378950 (v7), 484529 (v8) GeekBench: 11936 (v4.4), 3038 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (103h endurance)
- 40W wired and 27W wireless charging
- Potentially larger main camera sensor
- Kirin 990 chipset may show its age
- Lack of Google Mobile Services
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W wired charging (38 min 0-100%)
- Snapdragon 865 5G chipset for superior performance
- Brighter display (871 nits)
- Shorter battery life (88h endurance)
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both the Mate 30 Pro and Find X2 Pro feature 'infinite' contrast ratio displays, typical of OLED technology. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 871 nits compared to the Mate 30 Pro’s 686 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the Oppo device. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Find X2 Pro’s brighter panel provides a tangible advantage in outdoor scenarios. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both were standard 60Hz panels at launch.
Camera Comparison
Both devices excel in photography and videography, but details beyond 'Photo/Video' capabilities are limited. The larger sensor size, if present in either device (market data suggests the Mate 30 Pro had a larger main sensor), would be a significant advantage in low-light conditions. The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s Snapdragon ISP likely offers more advanced image processing algorithms. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Find X2 Pro’s processor gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: Huawei’s Kirin 990 (7nm) versus Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The Snapdragon 865, with its Cortex-A77 prime core, generally offers a slight edge in CPU performance, as evidenced by its 2.84 GHz clock speed compared to the Kirin 990’s 2.86 GHz Cortex-A76. The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from a more refined 7nm+ process, potentially leading to better thermal efficiency. While both phones are capable of handling demanding tasks, the Snapdragon 865 provides a more future-proof platform, particularly for gaming and 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 30 Pro’s 103-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 88-hour rating. This difference is substantial and highlights Huawei’s optimization for battery life. However, the Oppo Find X2 Pro compensates with its incredibly fast 65W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 38 minutes. The Mate 30 Pro’s 40W wired charging is respectable, but noticeably slower. The Find X2 Pro also offers 27W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features also present on the Mate 30 Pro, but the wired charging speed is the key differentiator.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 30 Pro if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day and beyond, even with heavy usage, and aren't concerned about the lack of Google Mobile Services. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds, a modern Snapdragon processor, and a cleaner Android experience, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.