Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Head-to-Head Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) emerges as the stronger choice. Its Kirin 980, while older, offers a competitive CPU architecture and benefits from 40W SuperCharge, significantly reducing downtime. However, the Oppo Reno 5G remains a viable option for those seeking a Qualcomm-powered experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat21 1400/200 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, July | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 85.4 x 8.4 mm (6.87 x 3.36 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 233 g (8.22 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant Stylus support | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~346 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 130.7 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Kirin 980 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.7", AF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | EVR-N29, EVR-AN00 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 760 EUR | About 880 EUR |
Huawei Mate 20 X (5G)
- Faster 40W SuperCharge technology
- Potentially better multi-core CPU performance with Kirin 980
- Larger display for immersive media consumption
- Potential software limitations due to Huawei’s geopolitical situation
- Larger form factor may not suit all users
Oppo Reno 5G
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 offers broad software compatibility
- Potentially more streamlined user experience
- More compact design (likely)
- Slower 20W charging
- Single high-performance core may not translate to sustained performance gains
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts cutting-edge display technology by today's standards, but differences exist. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits) are unavailable, both utilize 7nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency. The Mate 20 X (5G) features a larger 7.2-inch display, geared towards multimedia consumption, while the Reno 5G’s size is not specified, but is generally considered more manageable. Color accuracy and viewing angles are likely comparable given the era, but the larger screen of the Mate 20 X (5G) will provide a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but both phones aimed for flagship-level imaging. The focus should be on the main sensors and image processing. Without specific sensor sizes, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Huawei historically prioritized computational photography, meaning the Mate 20 X (5G) likely benefits from more aggressive image processing algorithms. The Oppo Reno 5G, leveraging Qualcomm’s ISP, may offer more natural-looking images. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor of either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography, but this is unconfirmed.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) utilizes the Kirin 980, a 7nm chip with a tri-cluster CPU configuration: two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.6 GHz, two more Cortex-A76 cores at 1.92 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz. The Oppo Reno 5G, conversely, employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (also 7nm) with a Kryo 485 configuration: one prime core at 2.84 GHz, three performance cores at 2.42 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.78 GHz. While the Snapdragon 855’s prime core boasts a higher clock speed, the Kirin 980’s dual high-performance cluster potentially offers better multi-core performance. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization, but the Kirin 980’s architecture is well-suited for sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) features 40W wired charging, a substantial advantage over the Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Mate 20 X (5G)’s larger form factor suggests a potentially larger battery. The combination of faster charging and potentially higher capacity makes the Mate 20 X (5G) the clear winner in terms of battery convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks for extended periods and value rapid charging. Its larger battery and faster charging are ideal for power users. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer the Qualcomm ecosystem, potentially benefiting from wider software compatibility and a slightly more streamlined user experience, and are less concerned with maximizing sustained performance or charging speed.