Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) vs Motorola Moto Z4: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and future-proofing with 5G, the Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) is the clear winner. Its Kirin 980 chipset delivers significantly more processing power. However, the Moto Z4 offers a comparable battery endurance rating at a potentially lower cost, making it suitable for budget-conscious users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) | Motorola Moto Z4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat21 1400/200 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, May. Released 2019, July | 2019, May. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 85.4 x 8.4 mm (6.87 x 3.36 x 0.33 in) | 158 x 75 x 7.4 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 233 g (8.22 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant Stylus support | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2244 pixels, 18.7:9 ratio (~346 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.2 inches, 130.7 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, HDR10 | OLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 980 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP10 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Leica optics, dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.7", AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Mods snap-on accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green | Flash Grey, Frost White |
| Models | EVR-N29, EVR-AN00 | - |
| Price | About 760 EUR | About 500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 70h |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 173234 (v7) GeekBench: 6515 (v4.4) GFXBench: 8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Mate 20 X (5G)
- Significantly more powerful Kirin 980 processor
- Faster 40W wired charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds
- Potentially higher price point
- Larger size may not suit all users
Motorola Moto Z4
- Comparable battery endurance rating
- Potentially lower price point
- Moto Mods ecosystem for expandable functionality
- Less powerful Snapdragon 675 processor
- Slower 15W wired charging
Display Comparison
While specific display details are absent, the Mate 20 X (5G) as a flagship likely featured a higher resolution and potentially brighter panel than the Moto Z4. The Moto Z4’s focus was on maximizing battery life, potentially at the expense of display quality. The Mate 20 X (5G)'s larger size suggests a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of detailed display specs highlights the Mate 20 X (5G)'s positioning as a premium device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, given its flagship status, the Mate 20 X (5G) likely featured a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and more advanced image processing capabilities. The Moto Z4 likely focused on providing a functional camera experience without prioritizing top-tier image quality. The Mate 20 X (5G)'s image processing, powered by the Kirin 980’s NPU, would likely offer superior dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The Kirin 980 (7nm) in the Mate 20 X (5G) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Snapdragon 675 (11nm) found in the Moto Z4. The Kirin 980’s octa-core configuration, with its two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores, provides significantly faster processing speeds for demanding applications. The Snapdragon 675, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with intensive gaming or multitasking compared to the Mate 20 X (5G). The 7nm process node of the Kirin 980 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 70 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the Mate 20 X (5G)'s more powerful processor. However, the Mate 20 X (5G) offers a significant advantage in charging speed with its 40W wired charging, allowing for much faster top-ups compared to the Moto Z4’s 15W charging. This means the Mate 20 X (5G) can recover from a low battery much quicker, mitigating any potential battery drain from its more demanding processor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Mate 20 X (5G) if you need a powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and want access to 5G connectivity. Its 40W fast charging is also a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Moto Z4 if you prioritize battery life and a modular ecosystem, and are willing to trade raw performance for affordability and the potential to expand functionality with Moto Mods.