Huawei Enjoy Z 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. While the Huawei Enjoy Z 5G offers competitive specs, the Snapdragon 765’s CPU architecture and the Moto G 5G Plus’s measured display brightness give it a slight edge in everyday use and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Enjoy Z 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, May 24. Released 2020, June 03 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Breathing Crystal, Midnight Black, Dark Blue | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | DVC-AN00 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy Z 5G
- Faster 22.5W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Mediatek Dimensity 800 offers strong raw CPU power
- Display brightness is unknown and likely lower than Moto G 5G Plus
- Software experience may be less refined than Motorola
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter 543 nit display for better outdoor visibility
- Snapdragon 765 offers balanced performance and efficiency
- Generally cleaner software experience
- Slower 20W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than Huawei Enjoy Z 5G
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a significant advantage over the unspecified brightness of the Huawei Enjoy Z 5G. Both share a 1269:1 contrast ratio, indicating similar levels of black depth. However, the Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility, a crucial factor for users frequently exposed to sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness suggests a more premium display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given Motorola’s history, the Moto G 5G Plus likely prioritizes natural image processing, while Huawei often leans towards more saturated and sharpened images. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer in this segment.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Huawei Enjoy Z 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800, while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G. The Snapdragon 765’s CPU configuration – a 2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, a 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and six 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores – offers a more hierarchical approach to task allocation, potentially leading to smoother multitasking. The Dimensity 800’s octa-core setup (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) relies on a more homogenous core arrangement. Both are built on a 7nm process, but Qualcomm’s Kryo cores are generally optimized for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both the Huawei Enjoy Z 5G and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, charging speeds differ: the Enjoy Z 5G supports 22.5W wired charging, while the Moto G 5G Plus is limited to 20W. This 2.5W difference translates to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time for the Huawei, though the real-world impact is likely minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy Z 5G if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem. Its Mediatek Dimensity 800 chipset offers strong raw processing power. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a more refined software experience, a brighter and more easily viewable display, and a chipset known for its balanced performance and efficiency.