The budget 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Huawei Enjoy 70z and Oppo K10x both aim to deliver connectivity and functionality without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Enjoy 70z relies on Huawei’s in-house Kirin 710A, while the K10x leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 695 5G. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10x is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers better performance and thermal management than the Enjoy 70z’s 14nm Kirin 710A. Crucially, the K10x’s 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for on-the-go users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.3 x 77.7 x 9 mm (6.63 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710A (14 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.0 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Blue, Black |
| Models | MGA-AL40 | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Huawei Enjoy 70z
- Potential Huawei ecosystem integration
- May be more readily available in certain regions
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Older 14nm chipset
- Slower 22.5W charging
- Less efficient processor
Oppo K10x
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Likely better image processing
- Oppo’s ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- Potentially slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO suggests a similar viewing experience, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium display technology.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of cameras, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon ISPs generally offer more advanced image processing capabilities than Huawei’s equivalent in the Kirin 710A. This suggests the K10x will likely produce more detailed and dynamic photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size or optical image stabilization (OIS) makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the K10x benefits from a more capable ISP.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a clear advantage over the Huawei Enjoy 70z’s Kirin 710A (14nm). The 6nm process node translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 695 features newer Kryo 660 cores – 2x2.2 GHz Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Silver – offering a performance edge over the Kirin 710A’s 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration. This means smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience on the K10x, particularly in demanding applications. The K10x is also likely to exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the ability to reach 80% charge in just 33 minutes is a significant advantage over the Enjoy 70z’s 22.5W charging. This drastically reduces downtime and makes the K10x more convenient for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day. Even if the Enjoy 70z has a slightly larger battery, the K10x’s faster charging will likely result in more usable uptime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 70z if you prioritize brand loyalty within the Huawei ecosystem and are comfortable with potentially slower charging speeds. Buy the Oppo K10x if you value faster performance, significantly quicker charging, and a more modern chipset architecture for improved efficiency and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a noticeably smoother experience than the Kirin 710A, especially during prolonged gaming sessions due to its superior thermal management.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 22.5W charging on the Huawei Enjoy 70z in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the K10x can take a phone from 0% to 80% in approximately 33 minutes. The Enjoy 70z’s 22.5W charging will likely take well over an hour to achieve the same level, making the K10x significantly more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Kirin 710A in the Huawei Enjoy 70z suffer from significant throttling under heavy load?
The Kirin 710A, being built on a 14nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 695. This means that sustained performance – like during long gaming sessions or video recording – will likely decrease as the phone heats up.
