The Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy and the vivo V29e represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at accessible price points, they diverge in their core strengths – Huawei prioritizing extended battery life and vivo focusing on a more capable chipset. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and 5G connectivity, the vivo V29e emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset offers a noticeable advantage in application loading and multitasking, while the 44W charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery capacity compared to the Enjoy 70X Energy.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 04 | 2023, October 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2023, October 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 74.9 x 8 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 194 g (6.67 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired
5W reverse wired | 44W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Forest Black, Rose Gold, Ice Creek Blue |
| Models | BRE-AL00a, BRE-AL00b | V2317 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 320 EUR |
Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy
- Potentially larger battery capacity for extended runtime.
- 40W fast charging provides reasonable recharge speeds.
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups.
- Unspecified chipset likely offers lower performance.
- Likely lacks 5G performance of Snapdragon 695.
vivo V29e
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) delivers superior performance and efficiency.
- 44W fast charging for quicker top-ups.
- Modern chipset supports advanced 5G features.
- Battery capacity is unknown, potentially smaller than Enjoy 70X Energy.
- May require more frequent charging depending on usage.
Display Comparison
Display specifications are currently unavailable for both devices. However, given their price points, we can anticipate both utilizing LCD panels. The absence of details like refresh rate or resolution suggests neither phone will be a standout in display quality. The focus will likely be on maximizing battery efficiency rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup geared towards social media sharing. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The focus will likely be on computational photography to enhance image quality. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution.
Performance
The vivo V29e’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a significant advantage over the unspecified chipset in the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy. The 6nm fabrication process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and potentially sustained performance during prolonged tasks. The Snapdragon 695’s octa-core configuration, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores, provides a balanced approach to both responsiveness and power conservation. This is crucial for users who engage in multitasking or light gaming. The Enjoy 70X Energy, lacking these details, likely relies on a less efficient and potentially older chipset, resulting in slower app loading times and a less fluid user experience.
Battery Life
The Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy boasts 40W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, while the vivo V29e steps up to 44W wired charging. While the difference of 4W isn’t massive, it can translate to slightly faster 0-100% charging times for the V29e. The Enjoy 70X Energy’s reverse wired charging is a useful feature for topping up accessories, but its 5W output is slow. The actual battery life will depend on the capacity of each device’s battery, which is currently unknown. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency in the V29e could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity, resulting in comparable real-world usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy if you absolutely prioritize maximizing battery life and require a phone primarily for basic communication and light usage. Its 40W charging, combined with a likely larger battery (though capacity is unspecified), will keep you going longer between charges. Buy the vivo V29e if you value a smoother, more responsive user experience, enjoy occasional gaming, and want the benefits of a more modern and efficient 6nm chipset like the Snapdragon 695.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo V29e handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it provides a playable experience for casual gamers.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo V29e with the 44W charger?
While a precise figure requires testing, we estimate the vivo V29e will charge from 0-100% in approximately 60-75 minutes with the included 44W charger. This is significantly faster than the Enjoy 70X Energy's 40W charging, assuming similar battery capacities.
❓ Does the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy support 5G connectivity?
The context data does not specify 5G support for the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy. Given its positioning as a budget device, it's possible it only supports 4G LTE. The vivo V29e, with its Snapdragon 695, definitively supports 5G.
❓ Is the camera quality on either phone good enough for social media posts?
Both phones will likely produce acceptable results for social media, particularly in good lighting conditions. However, don't expect flagship-level image quality. The lack of OIS and detailed sensor information suggests low-light performance will be limited.
