The Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy and Oppo Reno 10x Zoom represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Enjoy 70X Energy prioritizes battery life and efficient charging, while the Reno 10x Zoom, though older, boasts a flagship-level Snapdragon 855 chipset and a historically strong endurance rating. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy is the better choice. While the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom offers a more powerful processor, its age and slower charging speed make it less practical for modern usage patterns.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 74.9 x 8 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g or 194 g (6.67 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 640 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 4.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, ColorOS 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF OIS, 5x optical zoom, 10x hybrid zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired
5W reverse wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black, Mist Pink, Ocean Blue |
| Models | BRE-AL00a, BRE-AL00b | CPH1919, PCCM00 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 1020 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 107h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 364220 (v7), 407473 (v8)
GeekBench: 10395 (v4.4), 2103 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 35fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy
- Faster 40W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Likely longer battery lifespan due to newer battery technology.
- 5W reverse wired charging adds convenience.
- Chipset performance is likely lower than the Snapdragon 855.
- Display specifications are unknown and potentially less impressive.
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Powerful Snapdragon 855 processor for demanding tasks.
- Historically strong endurance rating (though diminished with age).
- Potentially superior display quality (OLED panel).
- Slower 20W charging.
- Battery capacity has likely degraded over time.
- Older chipset may exhibit more thermal throttling.
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s display is rated at 440 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure for its time, but likely appears dimmer compared to modern displays. The Enjoy 70X Energy’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market segment, it likely prioritizes efficiency over peak brightness. The Reno 10x Zoom’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests a good quality OLED panel. Without further data on the Enjoy 70X Energy’s panel type, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s an LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Reno 10x Zoom’s name suggests a focus on zoom capabilities, potentially utilizing a periscope lens system. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The Enjoy 70X Energy’s camera system is unknown, but it’s likely to be a more basic setup focused on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, as image quality is typically poor.
Performance
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) chipset was a flagship processor in its day, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This provides significantly more processing power than what is typically found in the Enjoy 70X Energy’s segment. However, the 855 is an older architecture, and while capable, it will likely exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load compared to newer, more efficient chipsets. The Enjoy 70X Energy’s chipset is not specified, but it’s likely a more power-efficient, mid-range offering designed for everyday tasks rather than intensive gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating similar overall battery life *when new*. However, the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s battery has aged, meaning its capacity is likely reduced. The Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy compensates with a 40W wired charging capability, significantly faster than the Reno 10x Zoom’s 20W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time for the Enjoy 70X Energy, a crucial advantage for users who need to top up their battery quickly. The Enjoy 70X Energy also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Reno 10x Zoom.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy if you need a phone that can reliably last through a full day of heavy use and charges quickly. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets. Buy the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications and gaming, and are willing to accept slower charging and potentially reduced battery longevity due to its age.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Given the age of the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom, is the battery still reliable for a full day of use?
The Oppo Reno 10x Zoom’s battery, while initially rated for 107 hours of endurance, has likely experienced capacity degradation over time. While it may still function, expect reduced battery life compared to its original performance, potentially requiring more frequent charging. The Enjoy 70X Energy, with its newer battery, offers more predictable and reliable all-day performance.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom still hold up for gaming in 2024?
The Snapdragon 855 is still a capable chipset for gaming, but it won’t deliver the same performance as newer flagship processors. You can expect to run most games at medium to high settings, but may encounter occasional frame drops or throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Enjoy 70X Energy’s chipset is less powerful, making it less suitable for demanding games.
❓ How much faster is the 40W charging on the Huawei Enjoy 70X Energy compared to the 20W charging on the Oppo Reno 10x Zoom?
40W charging is significantly faster than 20W charging. While exact charge times depend on battery capacity and other factors, the Enjoy 70X Energy can realistically charge from 0-100% in approximately 60-90 minutes, whereas the Reno 10x Zoom will likely take over 2 hours.
