The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Huawei Enjoy 60X and the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT. Both offer compelling features at accessible price points, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one reigns supreme.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster processor, blazing-fast charging, and brighter display. While the Enjoy 60X offers a decent experience, the Poco X3 GT provides a more premium and powerful feel for a similar price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 17 | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 27 | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.6 x 79.9 x 8.9 mm (6.76 x 3.15 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 216 g (7.62 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~376 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.95 inches, 117.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | HarmonyOS 3.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, 26mm (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired
22.5W reverse wired (512GB only) | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Green, Orange | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | STG-AL00 | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9)
GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 60X
- Reliable brand
- Potentially good battery life (110h rating)
- Reverse charging (512GB model)
- Decent build quality (typical of Huawei)
- Less powerful processor
- Slower charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited availability in some regions
- Camera performance likely inferior
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Brighter display
- Likely better camera performance
- High refresh rate display (assumed)
- Older model (potential software support concerns)
- Battery life may be slightly less than Enjoy 60X in real-world usage (though charging is faster)
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco X3 GT boasts a significant advantage with its higher measured brightness (537 nits) compared to the Enjoy 60X (specs unavailable, assumed lower). Both offer a 1425:1 contrast ratio, suggesting good blacks, but the Poco's brightness will make it more visible outdoors. The Poco X3 GT likely has a higher refresh rate, enhancing smoothness, while the Enjoy 60X is likely standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is difficult to definitively compare without detailed testing. Both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. However, the Poco X3 GT likely has a more advanced camera system due to its higher-end chipset, potentially offering better image processing and features. The Enjoy 60X may compensate with Huawei's image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT's Dimensity 1100 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Enjoy 60X's Snapdragon 680. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance. The Dimensity 1100's Cortex-A78 cores provide a substantial boost over the Kryo 265 cores in the Enjoy 60X.
Battery Life
While both phones have endurance ratings of 110h, the Poco X3 GT's 67W charging is a game-changer. It can fully charge in just 42 minutes, while the Enjoy 60X's 22.5W charging will take considerably longer. This difference in charging speed is a major factor for many users.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Huawei Enjoy 60X? Users prioritizing a reliable, basic smartphone experience with Huawei's ecosystem and potentially reverse charging (512GB model). Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT? Gamers, power users, and anyone seeking a fast-charging, high-performance device with a vibrant display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Huawei Enjoy 60X good for gaming?
The Enjoy 60X can handle basic games, but its processor isn't ideal for demanding titles. The Poco X3 GT is a much better choice for gamers.
❓ How long does it take to charge the Poco X3 GT?
The Poco X3 GT charges incredibly fast with its 67W charger, reaching 100% in approximately 42 minutes.
