Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. While the Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro’s Dimensity 800 is capable, the Snapdragon 765 in the Moto G 5G Plus offers a more refined experience, backed by a comparable battery life and a measured 543 nits of peak brightness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 19. Released 2020, June 24 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Night Black, Dark Blue, Galaxy Silver | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | DVC-AN20 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro
- Potentially lower price point
- Faster charging (22.5W)
- Dimensity 800 offers good performance for the price
- Less refined CPU architecture compared to Snapdragon 765
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than Moto G 5G Plus
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- More sophisticated CPU architecture (Snapdragon 765)
- Proven chipset with good software optimization
- Slightly slower charging (20W)
- May be more expensive than the Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, exceeding what we’d expect in this price bracket, making it more usable outdoors. While the Enjoy 20 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, the Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight, a significant advantage for outdoor users. The lack of information on the Enjoy 20 Pro’s panel type makes it difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the Moto G 5G Plus.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, aiming for balanced and realistic images. Huawei, historically, has leaned towards more saturated and contrast-boosted images. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, potentially impacting low-light video quality. The lack of detail makes it impossible to assess the quality of any included macro or depth sensors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7nm), while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm). The Snapdragon 765’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores – is architecturally more sophisticated than the Enjoy 20 Pro’s Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to potentially better single-core performance on the Motorola, beneficial for responsive app launches and smoother multitasking. Both chips are 7nm, suggesting similar power efficiency, but Qualcomm’s optimizations often yield better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s battery life is impressive given its brighter display. The Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro supports 22.5W wired charging, slightly faster than the Motorola’s 20W charging. However, the difference of 2.5W is unlikely to result in a dramatically faster charging experience. Both phones should comfortably last a full day of moderate use, but the Motorola’s brighter display might consume slightly more power.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 20 Pro if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with the Huawei ecosystem. Its Dimensity 800 chipset provides solid performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a more balanced experience with a proven chipset, a brighter display, and a longer-term software support outlook, making it ideal for users who frequently consume media and play mobile games.