Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed 5G Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall value and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. While the Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G boasts faster 40W charging, the Moto G 5G Plus’s Snapdragon 765 offers a more refined CPU architecture and comparable battery endurance, making it a more balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 10 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.63 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green, Pink | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | FRL-AN00a | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G
- Faster 40W wired charging
- Potentially lower price (depending on region)
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful CPU architecture
- Display specifications unknown, potentially lower brightness
- Camera details lacking
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 chipset
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- Proven 114-hour battery endurance
- Slower 20W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera details lacking
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a display with a measured peak brightness of 543 nits and a contrast ratio of 1269:1. While the Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G’s display specifications are not provided, the Moto G 5G Plus’s brightness offers better visibility in outdoor conditions. Both share the same contrast ratio, suggesting similar panel technology in terms of black levels. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this price segment, but the Moto G 5G Plus’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given Motorola’s history, the Moto G 5G Plus likely prioritizes image processing for natural colors and detail, while Huawei often leans towards more saturated and contrast-boosted images. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer, focusing instead on providing adequate imaging for social media and casual use.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7nm), while the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm). The Snapdragon 765’s CPU configuration – a 2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime core, a 2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold core, and six 1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver cores – represents a more hierarchical and generally more powerful architecture than the Dimensity 720’s dual 2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and six 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to potentially faster single-core performance on the Motorola, beneficial for responsive app launching and smoother multitasking. Both are 7nm chips, suggesting comparable power efficiency, but Qualcomm’s optimizations often yield better sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s endurance is achieved with a battery size not specified, while the Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G compensates for potentially lower battery capacity with its 40W wired charging. This allows for significantly faster top-ups – a crucial advantage for users who frequently deplete their battery. However, the Moto G 5G Plus’s endurance suggests efficient power management, minimizing the need for frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 20 Plus 5G if you absolutely prioritize charging speed and frequently find yourself needing to top up your battery quickly. Its 40W wired charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a more balanced performance profile, a slightly brighter display with a proven 114-hour endurance rating, and a chipset known for its stable performance in demanding applications.