Both the Huawei Enjoy 10 and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW target the budget-conscious consumer seeking 5G connectivity. However, they approach this goal with significantly different hardware. The Enjoy 10 relies on Huawei’s in-house Kirin 710F, while the A51 5G UW leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 765G. This comparison will dissect the implications of these chipset choices and determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a substantial performance uplift over the Enjoy 10’s Kirin 710F, making it better suited for demanding tasks and sustained workloads.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October. Released 2019, November | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora blue, Acacia red, Magic night black, Sky blue | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | ART-TL00, ART-AL00, ART-AL00x | SM-A516V |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
Huawei Enjoy 10
- Lower price point makes it accessible to budget-conscious buyers.
- Functional 5G connectivity for basic usage.
- Huawei’s EMUI software offers a unique user experience (preference-based).
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Snapdragon 765G.
- Less efficient chipset leads to potentially shorter battery life.
- Slower charging speeds.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- Superior performance thanks to the Snapdragon 765G chipset.
- More efficient processor for better battery life.
- Faster 15W charging.
- Better image processing capabilities.
- Higher price compared to the Huawei Enjoy 10.
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource-intensive.
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for display excellence. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processing power needed to drive a high-refresh-rate display, which neither phone offers. The A51 5G UW’s more powerful GPU is better positioned to handle graphically intensive display features should a custom ROM introduce support in the future.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is generally more advanced than the Kirin 710F’s, offering superior image processing capabilities. This means the A51 5G UW is likely to produce more detailed and dynamic photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Enjoy 10 likely relies more heavily on software processing to compensate for its less capable hardware. The presence of a dedicated 5G modem in the Snapdragon 765G also allows for faster image uploads and sharing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a significant leap in efficiency and performance compared to the Huawei Enjoy 10’s 12nm Kirin 710F. The Snapdragon 765G’s Kryo CPU architecture (1x2.4 GHz Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Gold, 6x1.8 GHz Silver) is more sophisticated than the Kirin 710F’s (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53), offering better sustained performance and improved multi-core scores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Samsung device. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling under load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW supports 15W wired charging, a modest improvement over the Huawei Enjoy 10’s 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 765G’s superior power efficiency means the A51 5G UW will likely deliver comparable or even better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. The faster charging, though not groundbreaking, will reduce downtime for users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 10 if you need a basic, functional 5G smartphone with a focus on cost savings and are willing to compromise on performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prioritize smoother multitasking, better gaming capabilities, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Kirin 710F struggle with demanding 5G applications like cloud gaming?
Yes, the Kirin 710F’s limited processing power and GPU capabilities will likely result in a subpar experience with demanding 5G applications like cloud gaming. Expect noticeable lag, frame drops, and potentially overheating. The Snapdragon 765G in the A51 5G UW is far better equipped to handle these workloads.
❓ How much of a real-world performance difference will I notice between the two phones during everyday tasks?
You'll notice a significant difference. The Snapdragon 765G provides a much smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking, opening apps, and browsing the web. The Kirin 710F will feel noticeably slower and may exhibit occasional stuttering, especially with multiple apps open.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the A51 5G UW a substantial improvement over the Enjoy 10's 10W charging?
While not a revolutionary difference, 15W charging is noticeably faster than 10W. You can expect to shave off approximately 30-60 minutes of charging time to reach 100%, which can be significant for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
