The Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they diverge in their core hardware choices – Huawei opting for its in-house Kirin 710F while Xiaomi leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 665. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slightly more refined software experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T emerges as the better choice. While the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus offers a comparable CPU core count, the Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process and 18W charging give the Redmi Note 8T a noticeable edge in efficiency and convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, November 06. Released 2019, November 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77.3 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.34 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163.5 g (5.78 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - STK-AL00Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct - STK-TL00 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red Tea Orange, Emerald, Gradient, Magic Night Black | Starscape Blue, Moonlight White, Moonshadow Grey |
| Models | STK-AL00, STK-TL00 | M1908C3XG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.02 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -93.7dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1360:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 78dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 79dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 141077 (v7), 167395 (v8)
GeekBench: 5620 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus
- Potentially streamlined Huawei ecosystem integration.
- Comparable CPU core count to the Snapdragon 665.
- Similar battery endurance to the Redmi Note 8T.
- Less efficient 12nm Kirin 710F chipset.
- Significantly slower 10W charging.
- Limited information on camera capabilities.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
- More efficient 11nm Snapdragon 665 chipset.
- Faster 18W wired charging.
- Potentially better image processing with the Snapdragon ISP.
- MIUI software can be polarizing.
- Similar battery endurance to the Enjoy 10 Plus despite efficiency gains.
- Limited information on camera capabilities.
Display Comparison
Both the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T feature displays with a 1360:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Redmi Note 8T is specified with a measured peak brightness of 450 nits, providing a brighter viewing experience, particularly outdoors. While both use a nominal 1360:1 contrast ratio, real-world performance will depend on panel calibration, which is not specified in the provided data. The absence of refresh rate information suggests both devices operate at the standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones target similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Redmi Note 8T’s potential for better image signal processing (ISP) within the Snapdragon 665 could provide an edge in low-light scenarios. The lack of information suggests neither phone features advanced camera features like OIS.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T’s Snapdragon 665, built on an 11nm process, generally offers better power efficiency compared to the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus’s Kirin 710F (12nm). While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration – the Snapdragon 665 with 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver, and the Kirin 710F with 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 – the Snapdragon’s architecture and smaller node size contribute to improved sustained performance and thermal management. The Kirin 710F’s higher clock speeds on its performance cores *could* offer a slight advantage in burst workloads, but the 665’s efficiency is more beneficial for everyday use.
Battery Life
Both the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T achieve an endurance rating of 108 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Redmi Note 8T’s 18W wired charging significantly outperforms the Enjoy 10 Plus’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time for the Redmi Note 8T, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The equal endurance rating suggests the Snapdragon 665’s efficiency offsets any potential capacity differences not specified in the data.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus if you prioritize a potentially more streamlined user experience within Huawei’s ecosystem and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T if you value faster charging, a more open software environment (MIUI), and a chipset built on a more efficient manufacturing process, potentially leading to better sustained performance during demanding tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Kirin 710F in the Enjoy 10 Plus struggle with multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 665?
While both chips have eight cores, the Snapdragon 665’s more efficient architecture and 11nm process generally handle sustained multitasking better. The Kirin 710F might show some slowdown under heavy load, especially with numerous apps open simultaneously.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Redmi Note 8T with the 18W charger?
With the included 18W charger, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T can typically charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Enjoy 10 Plus’s 10W charging.
❓ Is the camera on either phone suitable for taking clear photos in low-light conditions?
Without detailed camera specifications, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the Snapdragon 665’s ISP in the Redmi Note 8T *potentially* offers better low-light image processing capabilities, but both phones likely require good lighting for optimal results.
❓ Will I experience significant lag when playing demanding games like PUBG Mobile on the Enjoy 10 Plus?
You may experience some lag or reduced frame rates in PUBG Mobile on the Enjoy 10 Plus, especially on higher graphics settings. The Kirin 710F is capable of running the game, but the Snapdragon 665 in the Redmi Note 8T is likely to provide a smoother experience.
