The Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A50s represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the key differences in performance and charging capabilities to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and slightly better performance, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is the better choice. Its Exynos 9611, built on a 10nm process, offers a modest performance edge over the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus’s Kirin 710F, and the 15W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the 10W charging on the Huawei.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 400/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, September. Released 2019, September | 2019, August 22. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 77.3 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) | 158.5 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 163.5 g (5.78 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Kirin 710F (12 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), EMUI 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2 | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - STK-AL00Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct - STK-TL00 | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Red Tea Orange, Emerald, Gradient, Magic Night Black | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Green, Prism Crush Violet2 |
| Models | STK-AL00, STK-TL00 | SM-A507F, SM-A507FN, SM-A5070 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.43 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 154761 (v7)
GeekBench: 5295 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 9.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus
- Potentially lower price point
- Huawei’s software optimizations
- May offer unique software features
- Slower 10W charging
- Less powerful Kirin 710F chipset
- 12nm process may lead to more heat
Samsung Galaxy A50s
- Faster 15W charging
- More efficient Exynos 9611 chipset
- 10nm process for better thermal management
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung’s software bloatware
- May lack some of Huawei’s unique features
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs LCD) aren't provided, both likely utilize LCD technology common in this price bracket. The focus here is on the underlying processing power, as display quality is often similar across budget phones. Bezels are expected to be comparable, and color accuracy will likely be standard for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor and supporting lenses (likely including a depth sensor). The image processing style will differ between Huawei and Samsung; Huawei typically emphasizes vibrant colors, while Samsung aims for more natural tones. The absence of optical image stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests image quality will be more reliant on software processing, particularly in low-light conditions. Any 2MP macro lenses included should be considered a marketing feature rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A50s holds a performance advantage thanks to its Exynos 9611 chipset, fabricated on a more efficient 10nm process compared to the Kirin 710F’s 12nm process. While both CPUs share the same Cortex-A73 (2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz) and Cortex-A53 core configuration, the Exynos benefits from the smaller node size, potentially leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. This translates to slightly quicker app loading times and smoother multitasking for the A50s. The GPU within the Exynos 9611 also offers a modest improvement over the Kirin 710F’s GPU.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the real-world impact of the charging wattage difference is significant. The Samsung Galaxy A50s’s 15W wired charging is 50% faster than the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus’s 10W charging. This means a considerably shorter time to reach a full charge, a crucial advantage for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. Even with a similar battery capacity, the A50s will offer less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Huawei Enjoy 10 Plus if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a suitable option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A50s if you value a slightly more responsive experience, faster charging, and a more established software ecosystem. This phone is better suited for users who enjoy occasional gaming or multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy A50s tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9611, built on a 10nm process, is generally more efficient than the Kirin 710F. While it can still get warm during extended gaming, it's less prone to significant throttling compared to the 12nm Kirin 710F, offering a more consistent frame rate over longer periods.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 10W and 15W really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is quite noticeable. 15W charging on the A50s can shave off a significant amount of time – potentially 30-60 minutes – to reach a full charge compared to the Enjoy 10 Plus’s 10W charging. This is especially beneficial for users who need to quickly top up their phone before leaving the house.
❓ Will I notice a significant performance difference between the two phones when using everyday apps like social media and web browsing?
The performance difference will be subtle but present. The Exynos 9611’s slightly faster CPU and more efficient architecture will result in marginally quicker app loading times and smoother scrolling, but for basic tasks, both phones will provide a functional experience.
