The HTC 8S and 8X were flagship Windows Phone devices, offering a taste of Microsoft's mobile ambitions. While both ran Windows Phone 8, they differed in key areas. This comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you decide which one was the better choice back then, and which might still hold some appeal today.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The HTC 8X CDMA generally edges out the 8S thanks to its faster processor and slightly more premium build. However, the 8S offered a better contrast ratio on its display. Ultimately, the 8X's performance advantage makes it the more desirable option for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 13 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, September. Released 2012, November | 2012, November. Released 2012, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, stainless steel frameGlass front, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 120.5 x 63 x 10.3 mm (4.74 x 2.48 x 0.41 in) | 132.4 x 66.2 x 10.1 mm (5.21 x 2.61 x 0.40 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 113 g (3.99 oz) | 132.1 g (4.66 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 2 |
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~342 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~60.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.3 inches, 51.0 cm2 (~58.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | S-LCD | S-LCD2 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Krait | Dual-core 1.5 GHz |
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 | - |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | - |
| OS | Microsoft Windows Phone 8, upgradable to WP8 GDR3 | Microsoft Windows Phone 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 4GB 512MB RAM | 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 2.1 MP |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| | No | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | Beats Audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 3.1, A2DP, EDR/ 4.0, LE after Amber update | 3.1, A2DP, EDR |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | OneDrive (15 GB cloud storage)
MP3/WAV/WMA/eAAC+ player
MP4/WMV/H.264/H.263 player
Document viewer
Voice memo/dial
Predictive text input | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 300 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 15 h |
| Type | Non-removable Li-Po 1700 mAh battery | Li-Ion 1800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Domino, Fiesta Red, Atlantic Blue, High-Rise Gray | California Blue, Graphite Black, Flame Red |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.97 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -79.7dB / Crosstalk -75.3dB | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1318:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 66dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB
| - |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -79.7dB / Crosstalk -75.3dB | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1318:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 75dB | - |
HTC Windows Phone 8S
- Better contrast ratio display
- Generally more affordable (historically)
- Compact size
- Slower processor
- Less premium build quality
- Battery life could be better
HTC Windows Phone 8X CDMA
- Faster processor for better performance
- More premium design and materials
- CDMA compatibility
- Potentially higher price (historically)
- Display contrast not as advertised
- Battery life could be better
Display Comparison
Both phones featured 4.3-inch Super LCD 2 displays, but the HTC 8S boasted a contrast ratio of 1318:1 (nominal), suggesting potentially richer blacks and better image quality. The 8X's display, while still good, didn't have this specific contrast ratio advertised. Resolution was the same at 1280 x 720 pixels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones had a similar camera setup – a 8MP rear camera and a 1.2MP front camera. Image quality was generally comparable, though the 8X might have had slightly better image processing due to its more powerful processor. Video recording capabilities were also similar.
Performance
The HTC 8X CDMA held a clear advantage here. It featured a dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait processor, compared to the 8S's 1.0 GHz Krait. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the 8X.
Battery Life
Battery life was a common complaint for both devices. The 8S had a 1800 mAh battery, while the 8X had a 1800 mAh battery as well. Real-world usage resulted in roughly a day of moderate use for both, but heavy users would likely need to charge before the end of the day.
Buying Guide
The HTC Windows Phone 8S is a good option for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a slightly more affordable price point (if you can find one). The HTC Windows Phone 8X CDMA is better suited for those who value performance and a more premium feel, especially if they need CDMA network compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What network does the HTC 8X CDMA support?
The HTC 8X CDMA is specifically designed for CDMA networks like Verizon and Sprint. It will not work on GSM networks like AT&T or T-Mobile without unlocking and proper configuration.
❓ Are these phones still worth buying?
Given their age and the lack of software updates, these phones are primarily of interest to collectors or those seeking a nostalgic Windows Phone experience. Finding working devices and compatible accessories can be challenging.