The HTC Wildfire E6 Star and Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW represent different approaches to the affordable 5G smartphone market. The A51 5G UW, released with broader carrier support, leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 765G, while the Wildfire E6 Star aims for extreme affordability, though detailed specifications are scarce. This comparison will focus on what *is* known about the A51 5G UW and infer the Wildfire E6 Star's positioning based on HTC's historical strategy.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and a more established ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset delivers a significantly better experience than what the Wildfire E6 Star likely offers, despite the HTC's potential cost advantage. However, the Wildfire E6 Star may appeal to those on the absolute tightest budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 10 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | - | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | 3000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A516V |
| Price | About 40 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
HTC Wildfire E6 Star
- Potentially the lowest price for 5G connectivity.
- May offer a clean Android experience (depending on HTC's software customization).
- Compact size (likely, based on HTC's historical designs).
- Significant performance limitations due to unknown, likely low-end chipset.
- Poor camera quality compared to the A51 5G UW.
- Limited software support and updates.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- Powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset for smooth performance.
- Reliable brand and software support from Samsung.
- Better camera quality with Qualcomm ISP.
- 15W charging is relatively slow.
- May be more expensive than the Wildfire E6 Star.
- Samsung's One UI can be resource-intensive.
Display Comparison
Given the lack of display specifications for the Wildfire E6 Star, we can only assess the A51 5G UW. Its display technology is typical for its price range, likely an LCD panel. The A51 5G UW's display is adequate for everyday use, but lacks the advanced features like high refresh rates or LTPO technology found in higher-end devices. The Wildfire E6 Star, aiming for cost reduction, almost certainly utilizes a lower-quality panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW's camera system, while not flagship-level, benefits from Qualcomm's image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 765G. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the Wildfire E6 Star, it's reasonable to assume it employs lower-resolution sensors and lacks features like optical image stabilization (OIS) found in the A51 5G UW. The A51 5G UW's camera will deliver more detailed photos and better low-light performance, though it's important to note that the quality of image processing is crucial, and Samsung's processing tends to be vibrant but sometimes over-sharpened.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW's Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G (7 nm) chipset is the defining performance factor in this comparison. The octa-core CPU configuration – 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – provides a balanced approach to handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The 7nm process node contributes to improved power efficiency compared to older chipsets. The Wildfire E6 Star, given its price point, likely uses a significantly less powerful MediaTek or Unisoc chipset, resulting in noticeable slowdowns with demanding applications. The A51 5G UW's GPU will also offer a superior gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW features 15W wired charging. While not particularly fast by today's standards, it's sufficient for topping up the battery overnight. The actual battery capacity of the A51 5G UW is not specified in the provided data, but typical for this class of device. The Wildfire E6 Star's battery life will depend heavily on its chipset and display efficiency. Given its likely lower-power components, it *might* achieve comparable battery life to the A51 5G UW, but the slower charging speed (if any) could be a drawback.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Wildfire E6 Star if you need a functional 5G smartphone at the lowest possible price point and are willing to compromise on performance and features. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prefer a smoother user experience, better gaming capabilities, and the reliability of a more established brand with a known chipset like the Snapdragon 765G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 765G in the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW still capable of playing modern mobile games?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't deliver the highest frame rates at maximum settings in the most demanding titles, it can comfortably handle most popular games at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. Expect a smoother experience than what the Wildfire E6 Star is likely to offer.
❓ How important is 5G connectivity on these phones, and will I actually notice a difference in speed?
The benefit of 5G depends heavily on your location and carrier coverage. If you live in an area with robust 5G infrastructure, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to 4G LTE. However, if 5G coverage is limited, you may not see a substantial difference. The A51 5G UW is equipped to take advantage of 5G when available, while the Wildfire E6 Star's 5G performance will be limited by its chipset.
❓ Given the limited information on the HTC Wildfire E6 Star, is it worth considering if I'm on a very tight budget?
If your budget is extremely limited and you simply need a functional 5G smartphone, the Wildfire E6 Star *might* be worth considering. However, be prepared to make significant compromises in performance, camera quality, and software support. It's crucial to research independent reviews before purchasing to understand the extent of these limitations.
