Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The HTC Wildfire E3 Lite and Oppo A16K are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A16K edges out the HTC Wildfire E3 Lite thanks to its more efficient chipset and slightly better performance. While both offer basic functionality, the A16K's Helio G35 provides a smoother experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. Both share the same charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 34, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 10 | 2021, November 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 10 | Available. Released 2021, November 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.5 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 3.01 x 0.36 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2349 |
| Price | - | About 550 EUR |
HTC Wildfire E3 lite
- Compact and lightweight design
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Underpowered chipset
- Basic camera performance
- Slow charging
Oppo A16K
- Better performance than Wildfire E3 Lite
- Slightly better camera
- Modern design
- Good battery life
- Still a budget phone with limitations
- Slow charging
- HD+ display quality is average
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.52-inch HD+ display, offering a similar viewing experience. Color accuracy and brightness are typical for budget devices, so don't expect vibrant visuals. The Oppo A16K might have a slightly better panel due to Oppo's generally better display calibration, but the difference is minimal.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A16K generally has a more versatile camera setup. While both offer a primary 13MP camera, the Oppo A16K often includes a depth sensor for improved portrait mode. Image quality on both is decent in good lighting, but expect noise and limited detail in low-light conditions. The Oppo A16K's image processing might be slightly better.
Performance
Here's where the Oppo A16K takes a clear lead. The Mediatek Helio G35 (12nm) is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). Expect smoother app loading, less lag, and better overall responsiveness on the Oppo A16K. The HTC Wildfire E3 Lite will handle basic tasks, but may struggle with more demanding apps or multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones feature a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the Oppo A16K's more efficient chipset will likely translate to slightly better real-world battery performance. Both phones support 10W charging, which is relatively slow.
Buying Guide
The HTC Wildfire E3 Lite is ideal for users who prioritize a compact design and basic calling/texting needs. The Oppo A16K is a better choice for those wanting a slightly more responsive experience, a bit more processing power for light multitasking, and a generally more modern feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo A16K is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful chipset. While neither is a gaming powerhouse, the A16K will handle basic games more smoothly.
❓ How much storage do these phones offer?
Both typically come with 32GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card. This is standard for budget phones.
❓ What operating system do these phones run?
Both phones run Android, likely with a custom skin from HTC and Oppo respectively. Expect Android Go Edition on the Wildfire E3 Lite for optimized performance on lower-end hardware.
