The HTC Wildfire E1 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A10e represent the lower end of the smartphone spectrum, targeting users prioritizing affordability. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality without breaking the bank, but significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate distinct performance characteristics. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic functionality and a slightly more efficient processor, the Samsung Galaxy A10e emerges as the better choice. Its Exynos 7884, built on a smaller 14nm process, offers a more balanced CPU configuration and potentially better sustained performance than the HTC Wildfire E1 Plus’s Helio P23.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 38, 40 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 29, 30, 66 - AT&T |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Metro PCS, T-Mobile |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 18. Released 2019, December 18 | 2019, July. Released 2019, August |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75 x 8.9 mm (6.20 x 2.95 x 0.35 in) | 147.3 x 69.6 x 8.4 mm (5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 165 g (5.82 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 720 x 1560 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.09 inches, 91.0 cm2 (~77.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.83 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 & 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6763 Helio P23 (16 nm) | Exynos 7884 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF | 8 MP, f/1.9, AF
or
5 MP, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.0
or
2 MP |
| Video | 720p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Red | Black |
| Models | - | SM-A102U, SM-S102DL, SM-A102U1, SM-A102W, SM-A102N |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 80 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.47 W/kg (head) 0.54 W/kg (body) |
HTC Wildfire E1 plus
- Potentially lower price point.
- Octa-core CPU offers multi-tasking capability.
- May be more readily available in certain markets.
- Less efficient 16nm process.
- Older and less powerful Cortex-A53 architecture.
- Likely to experience more thermal throttling.
Samsung Galaxy A10e
- More efficient 14nm process.
- More powerful Cortex-A73 cores for better performance.
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Could have limited availability in some regions.
- Still an entry-level device with limitations.
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Specific display specs are unavailable, but given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. However, the processor differences suggest the A10e may handle display rendering slightly smoother. The A10e’s Exynos 7884 has a more capable GPU, which could translate to better performance in UI animations and video playback. Bezels are likely substantial on both devices, typical for this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are unavailable for both devices. However, given their market positioning, image quality will likely be similar. Both will likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. The A10e’s more powerful processor could offer slightly better image processing capabilities, resulting in marginally improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The presence of a more capable GPU in the A10e could also aid in faster image capture and processing. It's unlikely either phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A10e’s Exynos 7884 utilizes a 14nm process and a heterogeneous core configuration of 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A73 and 6x1.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This architecture prioritizes performance with the A73 cores for demanding tasks. Conversely, the HTC Wildfire E1 Plus’s Mediatek Helio P23 (16nm) employs an octa-core setup of 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While the P23 has more cores, the A53 architecture is less efficient and powerful than the A73. The 14nm process of the Exynos also contributes to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. This means the A10e is likely to maintain performance for longer during tasks like gaming or video editing.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Exynos 7884’s 14nm process offers a power efficiency advantage over the Helio P23’s 16nm process. This means the A10e is likely to achieve comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery. Charging wattage is also unknown, but both are likely to support standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in relatively slow 0-100% charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Wildfire E1 Plus if you need a phone primarily for very light tasks like calls, texts, and occasional social media browsing, and are extremely budget-constrained. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A10e if you prefer a device capable of handling slightly more demanding apps, multitasking, and occasional light gaming, and value a more modern processor architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 7884 in the Galaxy A10e overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 7884 isn't a high-end gaming chip, its 14nm process and relatively efficient design mean it's less prone to overheating than the Helio P23 in the Wildfire E1 Plus. You can expect playable frame rates in less demanding games for extended periods, but graphically intensive titles may still cause some throttling.
❓ Is the performance difference between the Helio P23 and Exynos 7884 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Exynos 7884’s Cortex-A73 cores provide a significant performance boost over the Helio P23’s all-Cortex-A53 configuration. This translates to smoother scrolling, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience, especially when multitasking.
❓ Which phone is better for taking quick photos of documents?
The Samsung Galaxy A10e likely performs better for document scanning due to its potentially superior image processing. The Exynos 7884 can better correct perspective distortion and enhance clarity, resulting in more legible scans.
