The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite and the Oppo A57s aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Oppo A57s prioritizing processing power and charging speed, while the Wildfire E1 Lite likely focuses on minimizing cost through a simpler chipset and software experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Oppo A57s is the better choice. Its Helio G35 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU, provides a significantly more responsive experience than the quad-core Helio A20 in the Wildfire E1 Lite. The 33W fast charging is a game-changer in this price bracket, making the A57s a practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 24. Released 2020, September 24 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 147.9 x 71.4 x 8.9 mm (5.82 x 2.81 x 0.35 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 160 g (5.64 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~295 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.45 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~72.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 720p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | - |
HTC Wildfire E1 lite
- Potentially the lowest price point in the market.
- May run Android Go Edition for optimized performance.
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Significantly weaker processor performance.
- Slow charging speeds.
- Limited multitasking capabilities.
Oppo A57s
- Faster and more responsive performance with the Helio G35.
- 33W fast charging for quick top-ups.
- Better suited for multitasking and app usage.
- Slightly higher price compared to the Wildfire E1 Lite.
- May still exhibit performance limitations with demanding games.
- Camera quality likely remains basic.
Display Comparison
Neither HTC nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic screen size. Given the price point, both devices likely utilize LCD panels. However, the A57s’s more powerful chipset suggests a potentially higher refresh rate or more sophisticated display processing, though this is speculative. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a strong point on either.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given the market segment, both are likely to feature basic camera setups. It’s reasonable to assume the Oppo A57s may have a slightly more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated into the Helio G35, potentially leading to better image quality in favorable lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A57s’s Mediatek Helio G35 is a substantial upgrade over the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite’s Helio A20. The G35’s octa-core configuration (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) provides significantly more processing power for multitasking and demanding applications compared to the A20’s quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster app launch times and a smoother overall user experience. While both are built on a 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G35 are key. The A20 is likely to struggle with even moderate multitasking, while the A57s will handle it with relative ease.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Oppo A57s’s 33W wired charging capability is a major advantage. Oppo claims a 100% charge in 69 minutes, which is exceptionally fast for this price range. The HTC Wildfire E1 Lite likely supports standard 5W or 10W charging, resulting in significantly longer charging times. Even if the Wildfire E1 Lite has a slightly larger battery capacity, the A57s’s fast charging will make it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite if you absolutely need the lowest possible price and are comfortable with a very basic smartphone experience, potentially running Android Go Edition to optimize performance on limited hardware. Buy the Oppo A57s if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and the convenience of rapid 33W charging, even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A57s be able to run popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio G35 isn't a gaming powerhouse, the Oppo A57s should be able to run PUBG Mobile at lower settings (balanced graphics, medium frame rate). Expect some occasional frame drops during intense action. The HTC Wildfire E1 Lite would likely struggle significantly with PUBG Mobile, even at the lowest settings.
❓ Is the Android experience on the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite significantly different?
The HTC Wildfire E1 Lite may ship with Android Go Edition, a streamlined version of Android designed for devices with limited RAM and storage. This means a lighter user interface and optimized apps, but also potentially fewer features compared to the standard Android experience on the Oppo A57s.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite?
Without specific charging specifications, it's likely the HTC Wildfire E1 Lite will take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% using a standard 5W or 10W charger. The Oppo A57s, with its 33W charging, completes a full charge in just 69 minutes.
