Looking for an affordable HTC smartphone? The Wildfire E Plus and the 10 evo offer compelling options, but cater to different needs. This comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The HTC 10 evo is the clear winner. While the Wildfire E Plus is a budget option, the 10 evo boasts a significantly more powerful processor, superior camera capabilities, and a longer-lasting battery, making it a better overall value despite its age.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 24 | 2016, November. Released 2016, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 24 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 153.6 x 77.3 x 8.1 mm (6.05 x 3.04 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| | - | IP57 dust/water resistant (up to 1m. and 30 mins) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super LCD3 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Adreno 430 |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 7.0 (Nougat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
5 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps (24-bit/192kHz audio), 720p@120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - |
24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, QC2 |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 480 h (3G) |
| Talk time | - | Up to 23 h (3G) |
| Type | Li-Po 5150 mAh | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Silver, Black |
| Models | - | 10 evo, M10f, 2PYB2 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 58h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1357:1 (nominal), 2.407 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 65dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
GFXBench: 6.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Wildfire E plus
- Very affordable
- Compact size
- Basic functionality
- Weak processor
- Low-quality camera
- Short battery life
- Limited storage
HTC 10 evo
- Powerful processor
- Good camera quality
- Excellent battery life
- Fast charging (QC2)
- Premium build quality
- Older device
- Potentially limited software updates
- May be harder to find
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a respectable contrast ratio of 1357:1 (nominal) and 2.407 in sunlight, indicating good visibility outdoors. However, the HTC 10 evo likely has a slightly better display panel due to its higher overall build quality and age, potentially offering more accurate colors and better viewing angles. The Wildfire E Plus likely uses a more basic LCD panel.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the HTC 10 evo's Snapdragon 810 chipset typically supported better camera sensors and image processing. Expect noticeably better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the 10 evo. The Wildfire E Plus camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots.
Performance
The HTC 10 evo's Snapdragon 810 chipset with an octa-core processor (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) significantly outperforms the Wildfire E Plus's Mediatek MT6739. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 10 evo. The Wildfire E Plus will struggle with demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The HTC 10 evo boasts an impressive endurance rating of 58 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Wildfire E Plus's battery capacity is likely smaller, resulting in shorter usage times. The 10 evo's 18W wired charging (QC2) also provides faster charging speeds.
Buying Guide
The HTC Wildfire E Plus is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and affordability. The HTC 10 evo is a better choice for those seeking a more premium experience with better performance, camera quality, and battery life, and are comfortable with an older device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the HTC 10 evo still worth buying in 2024?
Yes, if you're on a budget and prioritize performance and battery life over the latest features. It's a surprisingly capable device for its age.
❓ What is the main difference between the Wildfire E Plus and the 10 evo?
The primary difference is performance. The 10 evo has a significantly more powerful processor and a better camera, while the Wildfire E Plus is a more basic, budget-friendly option.
