HTC U23 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the HTC U23 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options. The U23, with its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, aims for raw processing power, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes battery life and rapid charging with the MediaTek Dimensity 7030. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and incredibly fast charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. Its 68W charging and 10:28h active use score significantly outperform the HTC U23's 30W charging and unknown battery performance. However, the U23's Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers a potential edge in sustained performance.

PHONES
Phone Names HTC U23 Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66
5G bands1, 3, 7, 20, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2023, July 172023, September 14
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, July 26Available. Released 2023, September 14
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions166.6 x 77.1 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight202 g (7.13 oz)170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass VictusCorning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeOLED, 120HzP-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G610 MC3
OSAndroid 13Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens-
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE5.4, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging30W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless Reverse wired68W wired, 50% in 15 min
TypeLi-Ion 4600 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsAqua Blue, Roland VioletBlack, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz
Models-XT2307-1
Price-$ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900

HTC U23

  • Potentially faster CPU performance with Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
  • Wireless charging support (15W)
  • Reverse wireless charging capability

  • Slower 30W wired charging
  • Unknown battery life performance
  • Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo

Motorola Edge 40 Neo

  • Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
  • Ultra-fast 68W wired charging (50% in 15 min)
  • Brighter display (1073 nits)

  • No wireless charging support
  • Dimensity 7030 may trail in peak CPU performance
  • Potentially less efficient thermal management

Display Comparison

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the HTC U23, whose display brightness remains unspecified. While both likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The absence of refresh rate information for the U23 also puts the Edge 40 Neo ahead, assuming a standard 120Hz panel.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specifics for both devices. However, focusing on the core components, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from more advanced image processing capabilities typical of MediaTek’s Dimensity series. The absence of sensor size information for both phones makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Edge 40 Neo’s marketing emphasizes its camera capabilities, suggesting a more refined photographic experience. We can safely ignore the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices.

Performance

The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The HTC U23’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with its Cortex-A710 cores, potentially offering superior single-core performance. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm) features Cortex-A78 cores and a larger core count (2x2.5 GHz vs 1x2.4 GHz). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7030 may offer better power efficiency, potentially offsetting the Snapdragon’s architectural advantage. Real-world performance will depend on thermal management, an area where the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s 4nm process *should* provide an edge.

Battery Life

The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance. Its 10:28h active use score is a significant advantage, indicating excellent real-world endurance. Furthermore, the 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes, is substantially faster than the HTC U23’s 30W charging. The U23 does offer 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Edge 40 Neo, but the significantly faster wired charging of the Motorola device likely outweighs this benefit for most users.

Buying Guide

Buy the HTC U23 if you need a phone that can handle demanding applications and multitasking with a focus on raw processing speed, and wireless charging is a must-have. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize battery endurance, incredibly fast wired charging, and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Edge 40 Neo is ideal for users who are frequently on the go and need a reliable, long-lasting device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chip, sustained gaming can generate heat. However, Motorola typically employs effective thermal management solutions. The 6nm process node should help mitigate throttling compared to older, larger-node chips. User reports will be crucial to assess real-world thermal performance, but initial indications suggest it handles moderate gaming loads well.
❓ How does the 30W charging on the HTC U23 compare to typical fast charging standards?
30W charging is considered relatively slow by today's standards. While it's not *slow*, it will take significantly longer to fully charge the U23 compared to the Edge 40 Neo's 68W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over an hour, whereas the Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% in just 15 minutes.
❓ Is the reverse wireless charging on the HTC U23 practical for everyday use?
The 5W reverse wireless charging on the U23 is primarily a convenience feature. It's suitable for topping up accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, but it's too slow to meaningfully charge a smartphone. Consider it a 'nice-to-have' rather than a core functionality.