The HTC U20 5G, though released in 2020, remains a compelling option for those seeking 5G connectivity at a potentially reduced price. However, it faces stiff competition from newer budget offerings like the Wiko T3. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on how their chipsets and features translate into real-world user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing 5G connectivity and smoother performance for demanding tasks, the HTC U20 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Wiko T3 presents a viable option for basic smartphone users on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.56/0.9 Gbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 16. Released 2020, October 01 | 2021, December |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, December |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171.2 x 78.1 x 9.4 mm (6.74 x 3.07 x 0.37 in) | 165.3 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.51 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215.5 g (7.62 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, AF
5 MP
2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | Yes |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, SAR | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h 20 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Black, Gold |
| SAR EU | 0.44 W/kg (head) | - |
HTC U20 5G
- 5G Connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset for smoother performance
- Faster charging with QC4 support
- Potentially higher price point
- Older device, software updates may be limited
Wiko T3
- Extremely affordable price
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower performance demands
- Significantly slower performance
- No 5G connectivity
- Lower quality camera
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided for the Wiko T3, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given its market positioning, it likely features a 720p LCD panel. The HTC U20 5G, while also not having detailed display specs, benefits from the processing power of its Snapdragon 765G to potentially handle higher resolutions and refresh rates if equipped. The 12nm process of the Helio P35 in the Wiko T3 suggests lower power efficiency, potentially impacting display brightness and color accuracy compared to the 7nm Snapdragon.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both devices are limited. However, the HTC U20 5G, being a mid-range device at its launch, likely features a more capable primary sensor and image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 765G. The Helio P35’s ISP is geared towards basic image processing. While both phones may include multiple cameras, the Wiko T3’s image quality will likely be noticeably inferior, particularly in low-light conditions. The Snapdragon's processing power allows for features like better HDR and noise reduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The HTC U20 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7nm) boasts a Kryo 475 octa-core CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.4GHz, designed for sustained performance. This contrasts sharply with the Wiko T3’s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm), utilizing four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3GHz and another four at 1.8GHz. The Snapdragon 765G’s architecture, with its distinct performance tiers (Prime, Gold, Silver), allows for more efficient task allocation. The larger process node (12nm vs 7nm) of the Helio P35 translates to higher power consumption for similar tasks, and significantly lower performance in graphically intensive applications. The 5G modem integrated into the Snapdragon 765G is a key advantage, absent in the Wiko T3.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device. However, the Wiko T3’s less efficient Helio P35 chipset will likely result in shorter battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the HTC U20 5G. The HTC U20 5G supports 18W Quick Charge 4 (QC4) technology, enabling faster charging speeds compared to the Wiko T3, which likely supports standard charging rates. This means less downtime and more usable time for the HTC U20 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC U20 5G if you need 5G access, plan to use your phone for gaming or streaming, and value a more responsive user experience. Buy the Wiko T3 if you primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and light social media use, and are looking for the absolute lowest possible price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the HTC U20 5G receive Android updates?
Given its 2020 release date, the HTC U20 5G is unlikely to receive major Android version updates beyond Android 12. However, security patches may still be available. Check HTC's official support website for the latest information.
❓ Is the Helio P35 in the Wiko T3 sufficient for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
While PUBG Mobile may be playable on the Wiko T3, expect significantly reduced graphics settings and potential frame rate drops. The Helio P35 lacks the graphical horsepower for a smooth gaming experience, especially at higher settings.
❓ Does the HTC U20 5G support all 5G bands?
5G band support varies by region. Check the specific model number of the HTC U20 5G you are considering against your carrier's supported 5G bands to ensure compatibility.
❓ How much storage does the Wiko T3 offer, and is it expandable?
Storage specifications for the Wiko T3 are not readily available. However, budget phones often include limited internal storage (32GB or 64GB) and typically offer microSD card expansion for additional storage.
