HTC's smartphone lineup presents a curious case study in recent years. The U20 5G, released in 2020, aimed for a balance of performance and affordability, while the Desire 22 Pro, a more recent offering, attempts to modernize the experience. This comparison dissects the core differences between these two devices, focusing on their chipsets, cameras, and overall user experience to determine which one offers the best value in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more refined chipset, the HTC U20 5G emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765G, built on a 7nm process, offers a performance edge over the Desire 22 Pro’s Snapdragon 695, despite the latter’s newer 6nm fabrication. However, the Desire 22 Pro’s wireless and reverse charging capabilities add convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 20, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G 2.56/0.9 Gbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 16. Released 2020, October 01 | 2022, June 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, July 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 171.2 x 78.1 x 9.4 mm (6.74 x 3.07 x 0.37 in) | 166.3 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215.5 g (7.62 oz) | 205.5 g (7.27 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Dragontrail Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 620 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
13 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, SAR | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC4 | 18W wired
Wireless
Reverse wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 200 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h 20 min | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, White | Wave Gold, Starry Night Black |
| Price | - | About 460 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.44 W/kg (head) | - |
HTC U20 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G processor
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely lower price point due to age
- Lacks wireless charging
- Older chipset may have less advanced features
HTC Desire 22 Pro
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Less powerful processor
- May struggle with demanding applications
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given the U20 5G’s release date, it likely features a 60Hz panel, while the Desire 22 Pro may offer a slightly improved display experience. The absence of information regarding peak brightness, color accuracy, or panel technology makes a definitive comparison impossible, but the Desire 22 Pro’s newer manufacturing date suggests potential improvements in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor counts are scarce. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing. Without specific aperture or sensor size data, it’s difficult to assess the low-light performance. The U20 5G’s older chipset may have less advanced image signal processing capabilities compared to the Desire 22 Pro, potentially impacting image quality in challenging conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The HTC U20 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, a 7nm processor with an octa-core configuration featuring Kryo 475 cores clocked up to 2.4 GHz. This contrasts with the Desire 22 Pro’s Snapdragon 695, a 6nm chip with a slightly different core arrangement (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). While the 6nm process *should* offer better efficiency, the 765G’s higher clock speeds and more powerful Prime core translate to superior CPU performance. This difference is particularly noticeable in multi-tasking and demanding applications. The U20 5G will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices support 18W wired charging, but the Desire 22 Pro adds wireless and reverse wired charging. This is a significant advantage for users who value convenience. While the battery capacity remains unspecified for both models, the Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process *should* contribute to slightly better battery life under light to moderate usage. However, the U20 5G’s more powerful processor will consume more power during intensive tasks, potentially negating any efficiency gains from the 6nm process.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC U20 5G if you need a phone that can handle demanding applications and occasional gaming with a more capable processor. It’s ideal for users who value performance over the latest features. Buy the HTC Desire 22 Pro if you prioritize convenience features like wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Desire 22 Pro be sufficient for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can handle PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The U20 5G’s Snapdragon 765G will provide a noticeably better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ Does the HTC Desire 22 Pro’s reverse wireless charging work with any Qi-compatible device?
Yes, the Desire 22 Pro’s reverse wireless charging is compatible with any Qi-enabled device, allowing you to wirelessly charge earbuds, smartwatches, or even another smartphone. However, charging speeds will be slower than with a wired connection.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the U20 5G and Desire 22 Pro noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference will be minimal. Both phones will handle browsing, social media, and video streaming without issue. However, if you frequently switch between apps or use resource-intensive applications, the U20 5G’s more powerful processor will provide a smoother and more responsive experience.
