HTC U12+ vs Sony Xperia XZ3: A Battle of Endurance and Display Tech

Released in 2018, the HTC U12+ and Sony Xperia XZ3 represent distinct approaches to the flagship Android experience. While both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, they diverge significantly in battery performance and display characteristics, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers seeking a balance between power and longevity.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing battery life and a more vibrant display, the Sony Xperia XZ3 emerges as the clear winner. Its 90-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses the U12+'s 64 hours, and its 'Infinite' contrast ratio delivers a superior viewing experience, despite both phones sharing the same core processor.

PHONES
Phone Names HTC U12+ Sony Xperia XZ3
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - H8416, H9436, H9493
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 49, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - H8416, H9436, H9493
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2018, May 23. Released 2018, June 292018, August 30. Released 2018, October 05
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions156.6 x 73.9 x 8.7 mm (6.17 x 2.91 x 0.34 in)158 x 73 x 9.9 mm (6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)193 g (6.81 oz)
 -IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~537 ppi density)1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~537 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper LCD6, HDR10P-OLED, HDR BT.2020
 -Triluminos display X-Reality Engine
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
GPUAdreno 630Adreno 630
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), Sense UIAndroid 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only
Internal64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM
 -UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP (12 MP effective), f/2.6, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, AF-
FeaturesLaser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDRLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single-19 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.3", 1.22µm, predictive PDAF
Video4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), HDR, 24-bit/96kHz stereo sound rec.4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS), 1080p@960fps, HDR
Selfie camera
Dual8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm-
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR
Single-13 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps (5-axis gyro-EIS)
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired, QC3, 50% in 35 min18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless (Qi)
Talk timeUp to 24 h (3G)-
TypeLi-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 3300 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsTranslucent Blue, Ceramic Black, Flame RedBlack, Silver White, Forest Green, Bordeaux Red
ModelsU12, 2Q55100H9436, H8416, H9493
PriceAbout 450 EURAbout 510 EUR
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -91.2dB / Crosstalk -88.7dB
Battery life-Endurance rating 90h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.502 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 71dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 284555 (v7), 295468 (v8) GeekBench: 8607 (v4.4), 2137 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

HTC U12+

  • Potentially more compact design (based on market positioning)
  • Quick Charge 3.0 support for fast wired charging
  • Reputable brand with a history of innovation

  • Significantly lower battery endurance (64h vs 90h)
  • Lacks wireless charging capability
  • Inferior display contrast ratio

Sony Xperia XZ3

  • Exceptional battery life (90h endurance rating)
  • Superior display contrast ratio for vibrant visuals
  • Wireless charging (Qi) for added convenience

  • Slightly lower CPU clock speed (potentially negligible)
  • May be larger and less pocketable than the U12+
  • Sony's software experience can be polarizing

Display Comparison

The Sony Xperia XZ3 boasts a significantly superior display experience, evidenced by its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) and a sunlight contrast ratio of 4.502, compared to the U12+'s 1818:1 and 3.085 respectively. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the XZ3’s higher contrast suggests more effective pixel control and deeper blacks. This translates to a more immersive viewing experience, particularly in bright sunlight. The lack of specific resolution data prevents a pixel density comparison, but the XZ3’s overall display quality is demonstrably higher based on contrast figures.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor and lens information is missing. Given the era, both likely feature multi-camera setups with standard wide and ultrawide lenses. The absence of specific details necessitates a reliance on brand reputation; Sony historically excels in image processing and color science, potentially giving the XZ3 an edge in image quality. However, without sensor size or aperture data, a definitive assessment is impossible. The inclusion of 'Photo / Video' as a feature for both is too generic to provide meaningful insight.

Performance

Both the HTC U12+ and Sony Xperia XZ3 are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold and 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver cores. The XZ3’s CPU clocks slightly lower at 2.7 GHz, but this difference is unlikely to be noticeable in real-world usage. Thermal management will likely be similar, with both devices potentially experiencing throttling under sustained heavy loads. The absence of RAM specifications prevents a detailed analysis of multitasking performance, but both likely feature 6GB or 8GB of RAM, sufficient for smooth operation.

Battery Life

The most significant difference lies in battery endurance. The Sony Xperia XZ3’s 90-hour endurance rating dwarfs the HTC U12+'s 64 hours. This substantial advantage suggests a more efficient power management system or a larger battery capacity within the XZ3. Both support 18W wired charging with Quick Charge 3.0 (U12+) and PD2.0 (XZ3), offering comparable charging speeds (50% in 35 minutes for the U12+). Crucially, the XZ3 adds wireless charging (Qi), a convenience feature absent on the U12+, further solidifying its position as the more feature-rich option.

Buying Guide

Buy the HTC U12+ if you prioritize a more compact form factor and are willing to trade battery life for a potentially more manageable size. Buy the Sony Xperia XZ3 if you demand all-day battery performance, a brighter and higher-contrast display, and the convenience of wireless charging. The XZ3 caters to power users and media consumers who need a phone that can keep up with their demanding lifestyles.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Sony Xperia XZ3's wireless charging work with all Qi chargers?
Yes, the Xperia XZ3 supports the Qi wireless charging standard, meaning it's compatible with any Qi-certified wireless charger. However, charging speeds may vary depending on the charger's output wattage. Using a higher-wattage charger will generally result in faster charging.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed between the U12+ and XZ3 noticeable in everyday tasks?
The 0.1 GHz difference in CPU clock speed (2.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz) is unlikely to be perceptible in typical smartphone usage, such as browsing, social media, or streaming video. Both phones utilize the same Snapdragon 845 chipset and will offer similar performance in most scenarios. The difference might only become apparent in extremely demanding tasks or prolonged gaming sessions.
❓ How does the U12+'s design compare to the XZ3 in terms of ergonomics and one-handed use?
While specific dimensions aren't provided, the HTC U12+ was generally considered a more compact flagship, potentially making it easier to handle and use with one hand. The Xperia XZ3, with its larger battery and display, is likely a more substantial device. Users prioritizing portability and one-handed operation may prefer the U12+.