HTC U12+ vs. HTC U23 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Past and Present

The HTC U12+ represented a high-water mark for HTC's flagship ambitions in 2018, boasting a top-tier Snapdragon processor and innovative features. Now, the U23 Pro arrives with a more modern, albeit mid-range, Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. This comparison dissects the trade-offs between raw power and improved efficiency, helping you determine which HTC device best suits your needs in 2024.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the HTC U23 Pro emerges as the better choice. While the U12+'s Snapdragon 845 still offers respectable performance, the U23 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, coupled with its significantly improved 83-hour endurance rating, provides a more balanced and future-proof experience. The addition of 30W charging and wireless charging further sweetens the deal.

PHONES
Phone Names HTC U12+ HTC U23 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 49, 41, 661, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands-1, 3, 7, 20, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 MbpsHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2018, May 232023, May 18
StatusAvailable. Released 2018, June 29Available. Released 2023, May 18
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions156.6 x 73.9 x 8.7 mm (6.17 x 2.91 x 0.34 in)166.6 x 77.1 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)
SIMSingle SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight188 g (6.63 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) Pressure-sensitive buttonsIP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~537 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper LCD6, HDR10OLED, 120Hz
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 630Adreno 644
OSAndroid 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), Sense UIAndroid 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC
Internal64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 16 MP (12 MP effective), f/2.6, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, AF-
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDRDual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64μm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), HDR, 24-bit/96kHz stereo sound rec.4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Dual8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm-
FeaturesHDR, panoramaHDR
Single-32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jack-Yes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
 32-bit/384kHz audio -
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1USB Type-C 3.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNAWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired, QC3, 50% in 35 min (advertised)30W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless Reverse wired
Talk timeUp to 24 h (3G)-
TypeLi-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 4600 mAh
Misc
ColorsTranslucent Blue, Ceramic Black, Flame RedSnow White, Coffee Black
ModelsU12, 2Q551002QC9200, 2QC9100, 2QCB100
PriceAbout 450 EURAbout 220 EUR
Tests
Audio quality Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -52.7dB-
Battery life Endurance rating 64h -
Camera Photo / Video-
Display Contrast ratio: 1818:1 (nominal), 3.085 (sunlight)-
Loudspeaker Voice 77dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 99dB -
Performance AnTuTu: 263696 (v7) GeekBench: 9001 (v4.4) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)-

HTC U12+

  • Potentially lower price due to age
  • Proven Snapdragon 845 performance
  • High contrast display (1818:1)

  • Shorter battery life (64h endurance)
  • Slower charging (18W wired only)
  • Older chipset architecture

HTC U23 Pro

  • Significantly longer battery life (83h endurance)
  • Faster 30W wired and 15W wireless charging
  • More efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)
  • Reverse wireless charging

  • Less raw processing power than the Snapdragon 845
  • Potentially higher price point

Display Comparison

The HTC U12+ boasts a high contrast ratio of 1818:1 (nominal), suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. However, the U23 Pro counters with a measured peak brightness of 727 nits, making it significantly more visible outdoors in direct sunlight. While panel technology details are missing for the U12+, the U23 Pro’s higher brightness is a tangible benefit for everyday usability. The U12+'s contrast ratio suggests a strong viewing experience in controlled environments, but the U23 Pro’s brightness provides a clear advantage in real-world scenarios.

Camera Comparison

Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but specific details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the U23 Pro benefits from newer image processing algorithms inherent in the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. The U12+’s camera system, while capable, is likely to show its age in dynamic range and low-light performance compared to the U23 Pro’s more modern processing pipeline. The absence of detailed camera specs necessitates focusing on the chipset’s impact on image quality.

Performance

The HTC U12+’s Snapdragon 845, built on a 10nm process, features an octa-core CPU with Kryo 385 cores clocked up to 2.8 GHz. This was a flagship processor in its time. The U23 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm), a more efficient chipset. While the 7 Gen 1’s Cortex-A710 cores peak at 2.4 GHz – lower than the 845’s Kryo cores – the 4nm fabrication process offers superior power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance under load. The U23 Pro’s architecture, while not as rawly powerful, is optimized for modern workloads and longer-term usability.

Battery Life

The U23 Pro’s 83-hour endurance rating is a significant leap over the U12+'s 64-hour rating. This difference is attributable to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s 4nm efficiency and likely a larger battery capacity (though specific mAh is not provided). Furthermore, the U23 Pro supports 30W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and even 5W reverse wireless charging – features absent on the U12+, which is limited to 18W Quick Charge 3.0. The U23 Pro offers a far more versatile and convenient charging experience, mitigating any potential battery capacity disadvantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the HTC U12+ if you prioritize finding a discounted flagship with proven performance and don't mind potentially shorter battery life. It's a good option for users who already have USB-C chargers and aren't reliant on wireless convenience. Buy the HTC U23 Pro if you value long battery life, faster charging (including wireless), and a more modern chipset with improved efficiency, even if it means sacrificing some peak processing power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 in the U23 Pro struggle with demanding games compared to the U12+'s Snapdragon 845?
While the Snapdragon 845 has a theoretical performance advantage in raw GPU power, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s improved thermal efficiency and optimized architecture allow for more sustained performance during gaming. You may see slightly lower peak frame rates in some titles on the U23 Pro, but the experience will likely be smoother overall due to less throttling.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a significant drawback for photography enthusiasts?
Yes, it is. However, the U23 Pro benefits from the advancements in computational photography enabled by the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s image signal processor. This means better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions, even without knowing specific sensor details.
❓ How much does the 30W charging on the U23 Pro actually improve the charging experience compared to the U12+'s 18W charging?
The U23 Pro’s 30W charging significantly reduces charging times. While exact 0-100% times aren't available, expect a noticeably faster top-up compared to the U12+. The addition of wireless charging is a major convenience factor the U12+ lacks.