HTC U12+ vs U12 life: A Deep Dive into HTC's 2018 Lineup

In 2018, HTC offered a bifurcated approach with the U12 series: the U12+ aimed for flagship status, while the U12 life targeted the mid-range. This comparison dissects the core differences – from processing power to camera capabilities – to determine which U12 best suits your needs and budget, especially as both devices age and pricing shifts.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the HTC U12+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and smoother multitasking, justifying the price premium. However, the U12 life remains a viable option for budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and a more affordable entry point into the HTC ecosystem.

PHONES
Phone Names HTC U12 life HTC U12+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 49, 41, 66
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat11 600/75 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2018, August. Released 2018, September2018, May 23
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2018, June 29
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frame
Dimensions158.5 x 75.4 x 8.3 mm (6.24 x 2.97 x 0.33 in)156.6 x 73.9 x 8.7 mm (6.17 x 2.91 x 0.34 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMSingle SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight175 g (6.17 oz)188 g (6.63 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) Pressure-sensitive buttons
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1440 x 2880 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~537 ppi density)
Size6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~77.7% screen-to-body ratio)6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper LCD6, HDR10
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm)Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
GPUAdreno 509Adreno 630
OSAndroid 8.1 (Oreo)Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 9.0 (Pie), Sense UI
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF Auxiliary lens12 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 16 MP (12 MP effective), f/2.6, 1/3.1", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, AF
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS), HDR, 24-bit/96kHz stereo sound rec.
Selfie camera
Dual-8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4", 1.12µm
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaHDR, panorama
Single13 MP, f/2.0-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYes-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/384kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, aptX HD, LE
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired18W wired, QC3, 50% in 35 min (advertised)
Talk time-Up to 24 h (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 3600 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsMoonlight Blue, Twilight PurpleTranslucent Blue, Ceramic Black, Flame Red
ModelsU12 life, 2Q6E1U12, 2Q55100
PriceAbout 230 EURAbout 450 EUR
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -93.7dB / Crosstalk -52.7dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 64h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1818:1 (nominal), 3.085 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 77dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 99dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 263696 (v7) GeekBench: 9001 (v4.4) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

HTC U12 life

  • More affordable price point
  • Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
  • Sufficient for everyday tasks

  • Significantly slower performance
  • Slower charging speeds
  • Likely inferior camera quality

HTC U12+

  • Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 845
  • Faster 18W charging with QC3
  • Superior display contrast and likely quality

  • Higher price
  • Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
  • May be harder to find new

Display Comparison

The HTC U12+ boasts a superior display experience, though specific details beyond contrast ratio are missing. The advertised 1818:1 nominal contrast ratio and 3.085:1 sunlight contrast suggest significantly better visibility in bright conditions compared to what we'd expect from the U12 life's panel. While both likely utilize LCD technology, the U12+'s contrast indicates a higher quality panel. The U12 life's display specs are not provided, making a direct comparison of resolution and color accuracy impossible, but it's reasonable to assume it's a lower-tier panel to meet its price point.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for both devices. However, given the U12+'s flagship positioning, it likely features a more advanced camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The U12 life likely relies on software processing to compensate for a less capable sensor. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it's difficult to quantify the difference, but the U12+ is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details suggests the U12 life's camera is a cost-saving measure.

Performance

The performance gap between the U12+ and U12 life is substantial. The U12+’s Snapdragon 845, built on a 10nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the U12 life’s Snapdragon 636 (14nm). The 845’s Kryo 385 cores, clocked up to 2.8 GHz, deliver markedly faster CPU performance, while its Adreno 630 GPU provides a far superior gaming experience. The 636 is capable, but will struggle with demanding titles at higher settings. The 10nm process of the 845 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to smoother performance in demanding apps and games on the U12+.

Battery Life

The U12+’s 18W charging with Quick Charge 3.0 support is a clear advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 35 minutes (advertised). The U12 life is limited to 10W wired charging, resulting in significantly slower charging times. While battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the U12+'s endurance rating of 64 hours suggests a well-optimized battery system, likely coupled with intelligent power management features. The slower charging on the U12 life necessitates longer periods plugged in, potentially offsetting any gains from a larger battery capacity.

Buying Guide

Buy the HTC U12 life if you prioritize long battery life and a lower price point, and your primary use cases involve everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption. You'll appreciate the efficiency of the Snapdragon 636. Buy the HTC U12+ if you demand flagship-level performance for gaming, demanding applications, and faster charging, and are willing to pay extra for the superior processing power and enhanced display contrast.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 636 in the U12 life capable of running modern games?
The Snapdragon 636 can handle many modern games, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings and resolution for a smooth experience. Demanding titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact may struggle to maintain consistent frame rates, while less intensive games will run adequately.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the U12+ compared to the U12 life?
The U12+ charges significantly faster thanks to its 18W Quick Charge 3.0 support. HTC advertises a 50% charge in 35 minutes. The U12 life's 10W charging will take considerably longer – likely over 2 hours for a full charge – making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the U12+ suffer from overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 845 in the U12+ is more efficient than the 636 in the U12 life, but it can still generate heat during extended gaming. However, the 10nm process and HTC's thermal management should prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance for a reasonable duration.
❓ Are there any known software update issues with either the U12+ or U12 life?
Both devices are older and have likely reached the end of their official software support lifecycle. While they may still function with their last updates, users should not expect new features or security patches. Custom ROMs may be an option for advanced users.