OnePlus 5T vs. HTC U11 Eyes: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 5T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 835 chipset offers a substantial performance advantage over the U11 Eyes’ Snapdragon 652, without sacrificing battery life. While the U11 Eyes has its merits, the 5T provides a better overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | HTC U11 Eyes | OnePlus 5T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2018, January. Released 2018, January | 2017, November 16. Released 2017, November 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.9 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 156.1 x 75 x 7.3 mm (6.15 x 2.95 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 162 g (5.71 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.0 inches, 92.9 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.01 inches, 93.7 cm2 (~80.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super LCD3 | Optic AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x2.45 GHz Kryo & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 510 | Adreno 540 |
| OS | Android 8.0 (Oreo), Sense UI | Android 7.1.1 (Nougat), upgradable to Android 10, OxygenOS 10.0.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF 20 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm, AF, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/1.7, 1.4 μm, PDAF, OIS | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@30/120fps, Auto HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 5 MP, f/2.2 5 MP | - |
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p (gyro-EIS) |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Dirac HD sound | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC3 | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3930 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3300 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Red, Blue | Midnight Black, Lava Red, Sandstone White |
| Models | 2Q4R100 | A5010 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 840 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -94.0dB / Crosstalk -93.7dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.789 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 68dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 69dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 207072 (v7), 260352 (v8) GeekBench: 6759 (v4.4), 1705 (v5.1) GFXBench: 24fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC U11 Eyes
- Potentially more compact design (based on HTC's historical trends)
- Comparable battery endurance rating
- QC3 fast charging support
- Significantly weaker Snapdragon 652 chipset
- Less responsive user experience
- Likely inferior camera performance
OnePlus 5T
- Powerful Snapdragon 835 chipset
- Faster 20W charging
- Superior performance for gaming and multitasking
- May be larger and less pocketable
- Potentially higher price (depending on current market)
- No specified water resistance
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio and a sunlight contrast ratio of 4.789, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, without knowing the panel technology (OLED vs. LCD) or peak brightness of the U11 Eyes, it's difficult to assess its overall display quality. The OnePlus 5T, being a flagship-adjacent device, likely benefits from superior color calibration and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices suggests standard 60Hz panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 835 in the OnePlus 5T provides a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The U11 Eyes’ ISP, tied to the older Snapdragon 652, will likely exhibit slower processing and less sophisticated noise reduction. We can assume the OnePlus 5T's camera system is more advanced overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 5T’s Snapdragon 835, built on a 10nm process, is a significant leap ahead of the HTC U11 Eyes’ Snapdragon 652 (28nm). The 835 features a more powerful CPU – an octa-core configuration with 4x2.45 GHz Kryo cores and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo cores – compared to the U11 Eyes’ unspecified octa-core CPU. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the 5T. The 10nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The 652 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the performance disparity. However, the OnePlus 5T’s 20W wired charging (QC3) is faster than the U11 Eyes’ 18W wired charging (QC3). This means the 5T can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn't specified, the more efficient Snapdragon 835 likely contributes to the 5T’s ability to maintain similar battery life with potentially less capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC U11 Eyes if you prioritize a potentially more compact form factor (though dimensions aren't provided, HTC historically focused on smaller devices) and are comfortable with a less demanding user experience. Buy the OnePlus 5T if you value speed, responsiveness, and a smoother experience with graphically intensive tasks like gaming or video editing. The 5T is the better choice for power users and those seeking longevity from their device.