The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the HTC Desire 22 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both promise a solid experience, but which one truly delivers?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the clear winner. Its superior display, longer battery life, more polished software, and generally better camera performance outweigh the Desire 22 Pro's slightly more compact design and reverse wireless charging. It's a more well-rounded package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 28 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.5 g (7.27 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
13 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
Wireless
Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Wave Gold, Starry Night Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 22 Pro
- Compact design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Decent performance for the price
- Less bright display
- Weaker performance than A54
- Shorter battery life
- Less polished software
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent display
- Long battery life
- Strong camera system
- Polished software
- Faster charging
- Larger size
- Exynos chipset can throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a significantly brighter display (980 nits vs. likely around 450-500 nits for the Desire 22 Pro) with a superior contrast ratio (infinite vs. typical). This translates to better outdoor visibility and more vibrant colors. While the Desire 22 Pro's display is adequate, the A54's is a noticeable upgrade.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A54's camera system is more versatile and consistently produces better results. While the Desire 22 Pro's camera is decent, the A54 offers improved image processing, better low-light performance, and potentially more advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Desire 22 Pro in real-world usage. While both are octa-core processors, the A54's Cortex-A78 cores offer a performance edge. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading on the A54. Gaming performance will also be better on the A54.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 shines in battery life, with an endurance rating of 119 hours and active use lasting over 11 hours. The Desire 22 Pro's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A54's longevity. The A54's 25W charging is also faster than the Desire 22 Pro's 18W.
Buying Guide
The HTC Desire 22 Pro is a good option for users prioritizing a smaller form factor and reverse wireless charging on a tighter budget. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, excellent battery life, a reliable camera system, and the stability of Samsung's software ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 will receive longer software updates and security patches compared to the HTC Desire 22 Pro, thanks to Samsung's commitment to long-term support.
❓ Is the HTC Desire 22 Pro worth considering if I want reverse wireless charging?
Yes, if reverse wireless charging is a must-have feature and you're on a tight budget, the Desire 22 Pro is a viable option. However, consider the trade-offs in other areas like display and battery life.
