HTC Desire 22 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G emerges as the stronger contender, boasting a brighter display, faster charging, and a more established brand reputation. While the Desire 22 Pro offers a unique design and reverse wireless charging, the A53's overall package is more compelling for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | HTC Desire 22 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 7, 20, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 28 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 10 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.55 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.5 g (7.27 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.8 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired Wireless Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Wave Gold, Starry Night Black | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | - | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 460 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 22 Pro
- Unique design
- Reverse wireless charging
- Decent performance for the price
- Less bright display
- Slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially weaker camera
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster charging
- More powerful processor
- Excellent battery life
- Reputable brand
- Design may be less distinctive
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 830 nits max brightness provides excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, while the infinite contrast ratio promises deeper blacks and richer colors. The Desire 22 Pro's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of vibrancy and outdoor usability. Expect a 6.67-inch OLED display on the A53 and a 6.6-inch IPS LCD on the Desire 22 Pro.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A53 5G is expected to have a more versatile and higher-quality camera system. While specific megapixel counts are not the only factor, Samsung's image processing and overall camera hardware are typically superior. The A53 likely offers better low-light performance and more advanced features. The Desire 22 Pro's camera is likely decent but won't match the A53's capabilities.
Performance
The Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Desire 22 Pro. While both are octa-core processors, the A53's Cortex-A78 cores offer a noticeable performance boost in demanding tasks and gaming. The A53's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency. However, both phones will handle everyday tasks smoothly.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A53 5G boasting an endurance rating of 113 hours. The Desire 22 Pro's battery capacity is likely around 4500mAh, providing all-day usage. The A53's slightly more efficient chipset and optimized software contribute to its superior endurance. The A53 also supports 25W charging, faster than the Desire 22 Pro's 18W.
Buying Guide
The HTC Desire 22 Pro is a good choice for those seeking a unique design and reverse wireless charging on a budget. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, long battery life, and a reliable camera system from a trusted brand.