Both the HTC Desire 20+ and Realme 7 Pro target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. However, they diverge significantly in their approach to battery technology and charging speeds, making them appealing to different user profiles. This comparison dissects these differences, alongside performance and display characteristics, to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and minimal downtime, the Realme 7 Pro is the clear winner. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 720G chipset, the Realme 7 Pro’s blazing-fast 65W charging dramatically outperforms the HTC Desire 20+'s 15W charging, making it ideal for those constantly on the go.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE, Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 22 | 2020, September 03. Released 2020, September 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3+), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.7 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC4 | 65W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Orange, Twilight Black, Blue | Mirror Blue, Mirror Silver |
| Models | - | RMX2170 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.73 W/kg (head) 0.52 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | Rp 3,498,000 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 278414(v8)
GeekBench: 1811 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 20+
- Established Brand Reputation (HTC)
- Snapdragon 720G provides solid performance
- QC4 support for compatible chargers
- Slow 15W charging
- Limited display brightness information
- Camera specs are unknown
Realme 7 Pro
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Brighter 585 nit display
- Competitive pricing (Rp 3,498,000 for 128GB/8GB)
- Relatively newer brand (Realme)
- Potential for bloatware (typical of Realme)
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Realme 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 585 nits, compared to the unstated brightness of the Desire 20+. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the brighter panel on the Realme 7 Pro provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. Details regarding panel technology (IPS, AMOLED) and refresh rate are missing for both devices, limiting a full display assessment.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Realme 7 Pro (assumed based on typical Realme offerings) is unlikely to significantly impact image quality and should be considered a secondary feature. The primary camera's sensor size and image processing algorithms will be the key determinants of photo and video quality, but remain unknown.
Performance
Both the HTC Desire 20+ and Realme 7 Pro are equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver. This means identical CPU performance for most tasks. The absence of information regarding RAM type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) and storage speed (UFS 2.1 vs UFS 3.1) prevents a definitive statement on overall system responsiveness. However, given the similar chipsets, performance differences will likely be minimal in day-to-day usage, with thermal management potentially being a differentiating factor, though data is unavailable.
Battery Life
The Realme 7 Pro’s 65W wired charging is its standout feature, capable of charging from 0 to 50% in just 12 minutes and reaching 100% in 34 minutes. In contrast, the HTC Desire 20+ is limited to 15W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. Both phones have an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar battery life *once fully charged*. However, the Realme 7 Pro’s rapid charging mitigates the impact of battery drain, allowing for quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 20+ if you prioritize a brand with a longer history in the smartphone market and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme 7 Pro if you value rapid charging, maximizing uptime, and a more modern feature set, even if it means opting for a newer brand. Both offer similar performance for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the Realme 7 Pro's charging compared to the HTC Desire 20+ in a typical use case?
The Realme 7 Pro's 65W charging can add a significant charge in the time it takes the Desire 20+ to gain a minimal amount. A 30-minute charge on the Realme 7 Pro could easily provide 50-70% battery, while the Desire 20+ might only gain 20-30% with its 15W charging.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium settings. However, sustained gaming may lead to some throttling due to thermal limitations. Neither phone's thermal management capabilities are detailed, so performance will vary depending on ambient temperature and gaming duration.
❓ Is the 113-hour endurance rating a realistic expectation for both phones?
The 113-hour endurance rating is based on a specific usage model. Real-world battery life will vary significantly depending on your usage patterns, including screen brightness, app usage, and network connectivity. Expect lower battery life with heavy usage.
