HTC Desire 20+ vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Desire 20+'s Snapdragon 720G. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Moto G 5G Plus’s faster 20W charging is a significant convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | HTC Desire 20+ | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE, Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 22 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.7 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC4 | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dawn Orange, Twilight Black, Blue | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | - | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 20+
- Brand recognition for HTC loyalists
- Acceptable battery endurance (114h)
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 720G chipset
- Slower 15W charging
- Limited display brightness information
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 5G chipset
- Faster 20W charging with QC4
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- Motorola's software update track record can be inconsistent
- Similar battery endurance to the Desire 20+ despite faster charging
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Desire 20+, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the higher brightness of the Moto G 5G Plus provides a more comfortable viewing experience in various lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 765 in the Moto G 5G Plus generally offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The absence of detail regarding the Desire 20+'s camera suggests it may not be a primary selling point.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s Snapdragon 765 5G, fabricated on a 7nm process, represents a clear architectural advantage over the HTC Desire 20+'s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 765 features a Kryo 475 Prime core alongside a Kryo 475 Gold core, offering a more sophisticated CPU configuration than the 720G’s dual Kryo 465 Gold and hexa Kryo 465 Silver setup. This translates to faster application loading times and smoother performance in demanding tasks. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the HTC Desire 20+ and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Moto G 5G Plus benefits from 20W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support, while the Desire 20+ is limited to 15W charging. This means the Moto G 5G Plus will replenish its battery significantly faster, reducing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 20+ if you prioritize brand familiarity within the HTC ecosystem and are looking for a basic, functional 5G phone without demanding performance needs. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, faster charging speeds, and a slightly brighter display – all at a competitive price.