The HTC Desire 20+ and Xiaomi Poco F3 GT represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Desire 20+ aims for a balanced experience, while the Poco F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with a focus on raw power and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the HTC Desire 20+'s Snapdragon 720G and 15W charging, justifying the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, October 22 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.7 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC4 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Orange, Twilight Black, Blue | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | - | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
HTC Desire 20+
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Simpler, more streamlined user experience.
- Good efficiency for basic tasks.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco F3 GT.
- Slow 15W charging.
- Less capable camera system.
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 1200.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging.
- Likely superior camera capabilities.
- Higher price compared to the Desire 20+.
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load (though the 6nm node helps).
- Gaming-focused design may not appeal to all users.
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, the Poco F3 GT, given its gaming focus, likely features a higher refresh rate panel (120Hz is common for this chipset) compared to the Desire 20+. The Dimensity 1200's ISP also supports higher resolution displays. The Desire 20+ likely utilizes a standard 60Hz panel. Color accuracy and peak brightness are unknown for both, but the F3 GT's target audience suggests a more vibrant and responsive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Poco F3 GT, positioned as a gaming phone, often includes a more robust camera system to appeal to content creators. The Dimensity 1200’s ISP supports higher resolution sensors and advanced image processing capabilities. The Desire 20+ likely features a more basic camera setup focused on everyday photography. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is probable on the F3 GT, but unknown for the Desire 20+.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) in the Poco F3 GT is a substantial upgrade over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) in the Desire 20+. The Dimensity 1200’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core, delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 720G’s Kryo 465 cores, while efficient, are less capable in demanding tasks. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco F3 GT benefits from faster RAM speeds (likely LPDDR5) compared to the Desire 20+, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Desire 20+'s 15W charging, which will take considerably longer. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the F3 GT mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Poco F3 GT also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 20+ if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone with a focus on simplicity and a more conservative power profile. It's suitable for users who prioritize call quality and basic app usage. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prefer a high-performance device for gaming, streaming, and demanding applications, and if rapid charging is a must-have feature. This phone is geared towards enthusiasts and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 720G in the Desire 20+ sufficient for playing modern mobile games?
The Snapdragon 720G can handle many mobile games, but it will struggle with graphically demanding titles at higher settings. Expect reduced frame rates and potential stuttering compared to the Poco F3 GT's Dimensity 1200.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT compared to the 15W charging on the Desire 20+?
The 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT can fully charge the device in approximately 42 minutes, while the Desire 20+'s 15W charging will likely take over two hours. This difference is substantial and significantly improves convenience.
❓ Will the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and some heat generation is expected during intense gaming. However, the 6nm process node and potential for effective cooling solutions in the Poco F3 GT help mitigate thermal throttling, providing sustained performance for longer periods.
❓ Does the Poco F3 GT support high frame rate gaming (90fps or 120fps) in popular titles like PUBG Mobile?
The Poco F3 GT, with its powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset and likely high refresh rate display, is capable of supporting high frame rate gaming in PUBG Mobile and other compatible titles, offering a smoother and more responsive gaming experience.
