HTC Desire 20+ vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and slightly faster charging, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765 offers a modest but noticeable performance uplift over the Desire 20+'s Snapdragon 720G, and the 20W charging is a plus. However, the Desire 20+ remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | HTC Desire 20+ | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A, Cat6 300/75 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, October 22 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.9 x 75.7 x 9 mm (6.49 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) 5 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC4 | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dawn Orange, Twilight Black, Blue | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | - | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 20+
- Potentially lower price point
- Established HTC brand
- Comparable battery endurance
- Less powerful Snapdragon 720G
- Slower 15W charging
- Display likely less bright
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 5G
- Faster 20W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- Motorola's software update track record can be inconsistent
- Similar battery endurance to Desire 20+
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a significantly brighter display at 543 nits, compared to an unlisted value for the Desire 20+. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price bracket), the Moto G 5G Plus’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 765 in the Moto G 5G Plus generally offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests both phones target casual photographers rather than enthusiasts.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s Snapdragon 765 5G, fabricated on a 7nm process, offers a performance advantage over the HTC Desire 20+'s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). The 765 features a Kryo 475 Prime core alongside a Kryo 475 Gold core, providing a more robust architecture for demanding tasks. While both CPUs have six Kryo 465/475 Silver cores clocked at 1.8 GHz, the 765’s prime core provides a noticeable boost in single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both the HTC Desire 20+ and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Moto G 5G Plus supports 20W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4), while the Desire 20+ is limited to 15W QC4. This faster charging speed on the Moto G 5G Plus means significantly less time tethered to a wall outlet, offering a more convenient user experience. A full charge from 0-100% will be noticeably quicker on the Motorola device.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 20+ if you prioritize a brand with a long history in mobile and are looking for the most affordable 5G experience, accepting a slight performance compromise. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, coupled with faster charging capabilities, even if it means spending a bit more.