The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and HTC Desire 19+ represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Mi 9T Pro, released as a performance-focused option, aimed to deliver near-flagship capabilities at a competitive price. The Desire 19+, on the other hand, prioritized affordability, making it accessible to a wider audience. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset offers a significantly more responsive experience and superior gaming capabilities. However, the HTC Desire 19+ remains a viable option for those on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June 11. Released 2019, August 07 | 2019, August 21. Released 2019, August 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.15 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 9 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3850 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Star Can Blue, Jasmine White | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue |
| Models | - | M1903F11G |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8)
GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 19+
- Highly affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent battery endurance (103h)
- Weak performance due to Helio P35 chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited future-proofing
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 855 performance
- Fast 27W charging with QC4
- Excellent battery endurance (103h)
- Superior gaming capabilities
- Higher price compared to Desire 19+
- May be difficult to find new
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize IPS panels. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing for the Desire 19+. The Mi 9T Pro’s display benefits from the processing power of the Snapdragon 855 to potentially deliver more vibrant colors and smoother animations. While both likely offer a similar viewing experience for everyday use, the Mi 9T Pro has the potential for a more visually refined output.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Desire 19+, a direct comparison is limited. However, given its price point, it's likely equipped with a more basic camera system. The Mi 9T Pro, while not boasting the latest camera technology, benefits from the Snapdragon 855’s image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Mi 9T Pro’s ISP will likely deliver more detailed and dynamic range in photos compared to the Desire 19+.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the HTC Desire 19+'s Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12nm), which utilizes a less efficient architecture and lower clock speeds (2.3 GHz Cortex-A53). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 855 translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Mi 9T Pro will handle demanding apps and games with ease, while the Desire 19+ will struggle with more intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Desire 19+'s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Mi 9T Pro’s 27W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 (QC4) support is a significant advantage. This allows for much faster charging times – a full charge is likely achievable in under an hour. The Desire 19+, with its 10W charging, will take considerably longer to replenish its battery, making the Mi 9T Pro more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 19+ if you need a functional smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. You'll appreciate its simplicity and affordability. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro if you prefer a smoother, faster experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and are willing to spend a bit more for a significantly more capable device. The Mi 9T Pro offers a level of performance typically found in more expensive phones.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro still a good buy in 2024, considering its age?
Yes, the Mi 9T Pro remains a compelling option, especially for budget-conscious users. The Snapdragon 855 is still a capable chipset for most tasks, and its fast charging and good battery life are still competitive. However, software updates may be limited.
❓ Will the HTC Desire 19+ struggle with popular apps like TikTok or Instagram?
The Desire 19+'s Helio P35 chipset is likely to exhibit noticeable lag and slowdowns when running demanding apps like TikTok or Instagram, especially when multitasking. It's best suited for simpler applications.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 855 can generate heat under sustained load. However, the Mi 9T Pro’s thermal design is generally adequate to prevent significant throttling, allowing for reasonably long gaming sessions without major performance drops.
❓ What type of charging cable does the HTC Desire 19+ use?
Given its age and price point, the HTC Desire 19+ likely uses a Micro-USB charging cable. This is slower and less convenient than the USB-C port found on the Mi 9T Pro.
