The HTC Desire 19+ and Samsung Galaxy A50s represent compelling options in the sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware, impacting performance and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A50s is the superior choice. Its Exynos 9611 chipset, built on a more efficient 10nm process, provides a noticeable performance boost over the HTC Desire 19+'s Mediatek Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While charging is slightly faster on the A50s, both phones offer adequate battery life for daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June 11. Released 2019, August 07 | 2019, August 22. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.15 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 158.5 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 9 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3850 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Star Can Blue, Jasmine White | Prism Crush Black, Prism Crush White, Prism Crush Green, Prism Crush Violet2 |
| Models | - | SM-A507F, SM-A507FN, SM-A5070 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.43 W/kg (head) 1.55 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 154761 (v7)
GeekBench: 5295 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 9.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 19+
- Potentially lower price point
- Simpler software experience
- May offer slightly longer battery life under minimal use
- Significantly weaker performance
- Slower charging speed
- Less efficient chipset
Samsung Galaxy A50s
- Faster and more responsive performance
- Faster charging (15W)
- More efficient chipset (10nm)
- Potentially higher price
- Samsung's One UI can be resource-intensive
- May have more bloatware
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the core difference lies in the processing power needed to drive them. The A50s' Exynos 9611 has a more capable GPU, potentially leading to slightly smoother animations and transitions. Detailed display specs like resolution and brightness are unavailable, but the A50s' chipset suggests a more responsive visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the A50s likely benefits from Samsung’s superior image processing algorithms. While both phones likely include a standard and potentially a depth sensor, the A50s’ more powerful chipset allows for more complex image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A50s holds a clear advantage in performance. Its Exynos 9611, fabricated on a 10nm process, features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.3 GHz, a significant upgrade over the Desire 19+'s four Cortex-A53 cores at the same clock speed. The A73 architecture offers substantially improved instructions per clock (IPC), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. While both phones have an octa-core CPU, the architectural difference is critical. The Helio P35's 12nm process is less efficient, potentially leading to more heat generation under sustained load.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, making a direct mAh comparison impossible. However, the Samsung Galaxy A50s’ 15W wired charging is a notable advantage over the Desire 19+'s 10W charging. This translates to a faster 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. While the Helio P35's lower performance demands may result in slightly better battery *life* under light usage, the A50s’ faster charging is a more tangible benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 19+ if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize a minimal software experience. You'll appreciate its simplicity and potentially lower price point. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A50s if you value smoother performance for apps, occasional gaming, and a more feature-rich software experience. The A50s is the better option for users who demand more from their smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy A50s tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 9611 isn't a flagship-level chip, its 10nm process and thermal design generally prevent significant overheating during moderate gaming. Expect some warmth, but not throttling that severely impacts performance. The Desire 19+'s Helio P35, being less efficient, might actually throttle *sooner* under similar load.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P35 and Exynos 9611 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Exynos 9611's Cortex-A73 cores provide a significant boost in single-core performance, which directly impacts app launch speeds and overall responsiveness. Browsing will feel snappier, and scrolling through social media feeds will be smoother on the A50s.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the HTC Desire 19+ and Samsung Galaxy A50s?
HTC typically offers a cleaner, near-stock Android experience, while Samsung's One UI is more feature-rich but also more heavily customized. One UI includes features like Samsung Pay and Knox security, but can also come with pre-installed apps (bloatware). The Desire 19+ will likely receive fewer software updates than the A50s.
