The HTC Desire 19+ and Nokia 7.2 represent two approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Desire 19+ aims for affordability with a Mediatek Helio P35, while the Nokia 7.2 leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 660, promising a more refined experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Nokia 7.2 is the superior choice. While both phones share 10W charging, the Snapdragon 660 offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The Nokia 7.2’s display also boasts superior brightness.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June 11. Released 2019, August 07 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.15 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3850 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Star Can Blue, Jasmine White | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | - | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 19+
- Potentially lower price point
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Inferior performance compared to Snapdragon 660
- Likely lower quality display
- Limited camera capabilities
Nokia 7.2
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 660
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Potentially better camera system
- Slightly higher price point
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- May not be significantly better in battery life
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2’s display is a clear winner, achieving a measured peak brightness of 585 nits and a 1342:1 contrast ratio. While the Desire 19+’s display specifications are unavailable, the Nokia 7.2’s higher brightness ensures better visibility outdoors. The contrast ratio, though nominally specified as 1342:1, suggests a decent level of black reproduction, enhancing the viewing experience. Without comparable data for the Desire 19+, it’s safe to assume the Nokia 7.2 offers a more visually appealing display.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed specifications are lacking. However, given the Nokia 7.2’s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and better image processing. The absence of specific sensor details for either phone makes a definitive comparison difficult, but Nokia’s brand reputation suggests a greater emphasis on camera quality. The Desire 19+ likely relies on more basic image processing, potentially resulting in less detailed and dynamic photos.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2, built on a 14nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) found in the Desire 19+. The Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 cores (4x2.2 GHz Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Silver) offer a more efficient architecture than the Cortex-A53 cores (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz) of the Helio P35. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 660’s architecture provides a significant edge in real-world performance.
Battery Life
Both the HTC Desire 19+ and Nokia 7.2 share a 10W wired charging capability, indicating similar charging speeds. Both also have an endurance rating of 69h. This suggests comparable battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (which are not specified). The Snapdragon 660’s more efficient architecture in the Nokia 7.2 *could* translate to slightly better real-world battery performance, but the 10W charging limits the overall impact.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 19+ if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are prioritizing the absolute lowest price point. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value a smoother user experience, better display quality, and a more capable camera system, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 powerful enough for modern mobile games?
The Snapdragon 660 can handle many popular mobile games at medium settings. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it provides a significantly smoother gaming experience than the Helio P35 in the Desire 19+, especially in more demanding titles.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 support fast charging, or is 10W the only option?
Unfortunately, the Nokia 7.2 only supports 10W wired charging. This is a limitation of the device, and charging from 0-100% will take a considerable amount of time compared to phones with faster charging capabilities.
❓ How does the Mediatek Helio P35 handle multitasking in the HTC Desire 19+?
The Helio P35 is a budget chipset and can struggle with heavy multitasking. Expect some slowdowns and app reloading when switching between multiple applications. It's best suited for running one app at a time.
❓ What kind of software updates can I expect on the Nokia 7.2?
Nokia is known for providing timely Android updates and security patches. The Nokia 7.2 was part of the Android One program, guaranteeing at least two major Android version upgrades and three years of security updates, offering a more secure and up-to-date experience than many other budget phones.
