The Motorola Moto G7 Plus and HTC Desire 19+ represent two approaches to the budget smartphone market. The G7 Plus, released to critical acclaim, aimed for a balance of features and performance. The Desire 19+, while less celebrated, offered a more basic experience at a potentially lower price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus is the superior choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 chipset provides noticeably better performance and efficiency than the HTC Desire 19+'s MediaTek Helio P35, coupled with significantly faster 27W charging. While both phones offer similar battery endurance ratings, the G7 Plus’s charging speed is a game-changer.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, June 11. Released 2019, August 07 | 2019, February. Released 2019, March |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 156.2 x 74.8 x 8.5 mm (6.15 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 157 x 75.3 x 8.3 mm (6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2270 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 96.2 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 509 |
| OS | Android 9 (Pie) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 12 MP, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.25µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (Europe model) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 27W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Ion 3850 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Star Can Blue, Jasmine White | Deep Indigo, Viva Red |
| Models | - | XT1965 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 1.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.3dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 59h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425 (nominal), 3.010 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 70dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 84dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 117829 (v7)
GeekBench: 4927 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 5.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC Desire 19+
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Basic smartphone functionality
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 636
- 27W fast charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Better overall performance and responsiveness
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to Desire 19+
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both the HTC Desire 19+ and Motorola Moto G7 Plus share a similar display contrast ratio of 1425:1 (nominal) and 3.010:1 (sunlight), suggesting comparable visibility in bright conditions. However, detailed panel specifications like resolution and refresh rate are missing for the Desire 19+. The G7 Plus’s display, while not groundbreaking, benefits from Motorola’s image tuning, offering a generally pleasant viewing experience. Without further data on the Desire 19+, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles relative to the G7 Plus.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison impossible. However, given the G7 Plus’s positioning as a more feature-rich device, it likely incorporates a more capable camera system. The Desire 19+’s camera is likely focused on basic image capture, while the G7 Plus may offer features like improved low-light performance and potentially more advanced image processing algorithms. Without further data, it’s reasonable to assume the G7 Plus delivers superior image quality.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (14nm) significantly outperforms the HTC Desire 19+'s MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm). The Snapdragon 636 utilizes Kryo 260 cores – four Gold cores clocked at 1.8GHz and four Silver cores at 1.6GHz – offering a more efficient and powerful architecture than the Helio P35’s homogenous Cortex-A53 setup (2.3GHz & 1.8GHz). This translates to smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the G7 Plus. The 14nm process node of the Snapdragon 636 also contributes to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. The Helio P35, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and games.
Battery Life
Both the HTC Desire 19+ and Motorola Moto G7 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 59 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Desire 19+ is limited to 10W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charge time. The Moto G7 Plus, on the other hand, supports 27W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 standards. This allows for a much faster 0-100% charge, potentially reducing downtime considerably. While both phones may last a similar amount of time on a single charge, the G7 Plus’s rapid charging provides a substantial convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC Desire 19+ if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for essential tasks like calls, texts, and light social media, and you are on an extremely tight budget. Buy the Motorola Moto G7 Plus if you prioritize smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, faster charging, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 636 in the Moto G7 Plus still capable of playing modern mobile games?
While not a flagship-level processor, the Snapdragon 636 is capable of running many popular mobile games at medium settings. Expect playable frame rates in titles like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings for optimal performance. The Helio P35 in the Desire 19+ will struggle with these titles.
❓ How long does it actually take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G7 Plus with the 27W charger?
With the included 27W charger, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes. This is a significant improvement over the much slower charging time of the HTC Desire 19+, which could take upwards of 4-5 hours with its 10W charger.
❓ Does the Moto G7 Plus support wireless charging?
No, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus does not support wireless charging. It relies solely on wired charging via its USB-C port.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on each device?
Specific storage configurations for the Desire 19+ are difficult to ascertain. The Moto G7 Plus was typically available in 64GB and 128GB storage options, with microSD card support for expansion up to 256GB. This provides greater flexibility for storing photos, videos, and apps.
