HTC Desire 10 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S III mini: A Generational Leap in Smartphone Technology

Released years apart, the HTC Desire 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S III mini represent distinct eras in Android smartphone development. While both aimed for accessibility, the Desire 10 Pro, benefiting from later chipset advancements, offers a significantly different user experience. This comparison dissects the core differences, focusing on performance, battery, and camera capabilities to determine which device holds up better today.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user in 2024, the HTC Desire 10 Pro is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio P10 chipset delivers substantially better performance than the Samsung Galaxy S III mini’s NovaThor U8420, enabling smoother multitasking and app usage. While both boast similar battery endurance ratings, the Desire 10 Pro’s faster charging provides a more convenient experience.

PHONES
Phone Names HTC Desire 10 Pro Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40-
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 MbpsHSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA
Launch
Announced2016, September 20. Released 2016, December 202012, October. Released 2012, November
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass), aluminum back, aluminum frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions156.5 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.16 x 2.99 x 0.31 in)121.6 x 63 x 9.9 mm (4.79 x 2.48 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMMini-SIM
Weight165 g (5.82 oz)111.5 g (3.92 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)-
Resolution1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density)
Size5.5 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~70.5% screen-to-body ratio)4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2 (~59.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53)1.0 GHz dual-core Cortex-A9
ChipsetMediatek MT6755 Helio P10 (28 nm)NovaThor U8420
GPUMali-T860MP2Mali-400
OSAndroid 6.0 (Marshmallow)Android 4.1 (Jelly Bean)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM8GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 1GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1-
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panoramaLED flash, panorama
Single20 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide)5 MP, f/2.6, AF
Video1080p@30fps720p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µmVGA
Video1080p@30fps-
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, dual mono speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX
NFCYesYes (Market dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASSGPS, GLONASS
RadioFM radioStereo FM radio, RDS
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot
Features
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired-
Music playUp to 53 h-
Stand-byUp to 480 h (3G)Up to 450 h (2G) / Up to 430 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 19 h (3G)Up to 14 h 10 min (2G) / Up to 7 h 10 min (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removableLi-Ion 1500 mAh, removable
Misc
ColorsStone Black, Polar White, Royal Blue, Valentine Lux, Mint GreenWhite, Blue, Titan Gray, Amber Brown, Garnet Red, Onyx Black
ModelsDesire 10 pro, D10iGT-I8190, GT-I8190N, GT-I8190L, SM-G730A, SM-G730W8
PriceAbout 260 EURAbout 130 EUR
SAR-1.03 W/kg (head)     1.28 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.52 W/kg (head)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -82.1dB / Crosstalk -80.7dB
Battery life- Endurance rating 42h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 2.422:1 (sunlight)
Loudspeaker- Voice 66dB / Noise 63dB / Ring 76dB

HTC Desire 10 Pro

  • Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
  • Faster charging capabilities
  • Likely better camera image quality

  • May be larger and less pocketable than the S III mini
  • Potentially less software support

Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini

  • Extremely compact form factor
  • Simple and easy-to-use interface (for its time)
  • Potential collector's item appeal

  • Severely outdated processor and limited performance
  • Poor app compatibility with modern Android apps
  • Slow charging

Display Comparison

Both devices share a reported contrast ratio of infinite (nominal) and 2.422:1 in sunlight, suggesting similar outdoor visibility. However, the Desire 10 Pro likely benefits from a more modern display panel with improved color accuracy and viewing angles, though specific details like panel type (IPS vs. TFT) are unavailable for either device. The S III mini’s smaller screen size (assumed, based on its 'mini' designation) may offer a slightly higher pixel density, but the overall visual experience will be hampered by the older display technology.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Desire 10 Pro likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a higher-resolution sensor, though specific megapixel counts are unknown. The S III mini’s camera will likely produce noticeably lower-quality images, particularly in low-light conditions. Without further specifications, it’s difficult to assess the quality of either camera beyond acknowledging the Desire 10 Pro’s advantage due to its newer technology.

Performance

The performance disparity is stark. The HTC Desire 10 Pro’s Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10, with its octa-core CPU (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53), represents a significant architectural leap over the Samsung Galaxy S III mini’s 1.0 GHz dual-core Cortex-A9 powered by the NovaThor U8420. The Helio P10’s more modern Cortex-A53 cores and higher clock speeds translate to substantially faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run more demanding applications. The S III mini will struggle with many modern apps, experiencing noticeable lag and potential crashes. The 28nm process node of the Helio P10 also offers better power efficiency compared to the likely larger process node of the NovaThor.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both devices share an endurance rating of 42 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Desire 10 Pro’s 10W wired charging offers a significant convenience advantage over the S III mini, which likely has slower charging capabilities. While both may last a full day on a single charge with moderate use, the Desire 10 Pro allows for quicker top-ups, reducing downtime.

Buying Guide

Buy the HTC Desire 10 Pro if you need a device capable of handling modern apps and multitasking without significant lag. It’s suitable for users who prioritize a responsive experience, even if it’s not a flagship. Buy the Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini if you specifically desire a very compact form factor and are willing to accept severely limited performance and app compatibility. It’s best suited for basic communication and extremely light usage, or as a collector’s item.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy S III mini be able to run popular apps like WhatsApp or Facebook in 2024?
It's highly unlikely. The NovaThor U8420 processor and limited RAM in the S III mini will struggle to run modern versions of these apps, which are optimized for more powerful hardware. You may be able to find older, compatible versions, but functionality will be limited and security risks are higher.
❓ Does the HTC Desire 10 Pro support software updates, and is it still secure to use?
Software update support for the Desire 10 Pro is likely discontinued by HTC. While it may still function, it's important to be aware of potential security vulnerabilities due to the lack of ongoing security patches. Using a reputable mobile security app is recommended if you choose to use this device.
❓ Is the battery on the Samsung Galaxy S III mini likely to still hold a charge after all these years?
The battery on the S III mini is likely significantly degraded. Lithium-ion batteries lose capacity over time, and a phone of this age will likely have a drastically reduced battery life compared to its original 42-hour endurance rating. Replacing the battery may be possible, but finding a compatible replacement could be challenging.