Choosing between two HTC phones can be tough! The Butterfly 3 and Desire 828 both offer unique features, but cater to different users. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The HTC Butterfly 3 is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 810 chipset and faster charging. While the Desire 828 offers dual SIM functionality and a potentially lower price point, the Butterfly 3 delivers a superior overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, September. Released 2015, October | 2015, November. Released 2015, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 151 x 73 x 10 mm (5.94 x 2.87 x 0.39 in) | 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9 mm (6.21 x 3.11 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 148 g (5.22 oz) |
| | IP57 dust/water resistant (up to 1m. and 30 mins) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~565 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~67.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~67.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) | Octa-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) | Mediatek MT6753 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 430 | Mali-T720MP3 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop), upgradable to 6.0 (Marshmallow), Sence 7 | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), Sense UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20.2 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), AF
Secondary depth sensor | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF, OIS |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, 28mm (wide) | 4 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3", 2µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, aptX | 4.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS/ BDS (market dependant) |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 (MHL 3.0 TV-out) | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC2 | - |
| Stand-by | Up to 363 h (2G) / Up to 416 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 26 h (2G) / Up to 21 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 2700 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 2800 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Red, White | White |
| Models | B830x | - |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 130 EUR |
HTC Butterfly 3
- Superior Performance
- Vibrant Display
- Faster Charging (QC2)
- OIS Camera
- Potentially Higher Price
- Older Model
HTC Desire 828 dual sim
- Dual SIM Functionality
- More Affordable
- Larger Screen (slightly)
- Lower Performance
- Less Vibrant Display
- Slower Charging
- No OIS
Display Comparison
The Butterfly 3 boasts a 5.2-inch Super LCD 5 display with a 1080 x 1920 resolution, offering vibrant colors and sharp details. The Desire 828 features a 5.5-inch display with a 720 x 1280 resolution. While the Desire 828 has a slightly larger screen, the Butterfly 3's higher resolution and superior panel technology provide a noticeably better viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
The Butterfly 3 typically features a 13MP rear camera with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) and a 5MP front camera. The Desire 828 usually has a 13MP rear camera and a 5MP front camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the Butterfly 3's OIS provides better image stabilization, especially in low-light conditions. Image quality is generally better on the Butterfly 3 due to the more powerful processor handling image processing.
Performance
This is where the Butterfly 3 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 810 chipset with a combination of Cortex-A53 and A57 cores provides significantly faster processing speeds compared to the Desire 828's Mediatek MT6753. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Butterfly 3.
Battery Life
The Butterfly 3 has a 2700 mAh battery with 18W Quick Charge 2.0 support, allowing for faster charging. The Desire 828 typically has a 2500 mAh battery. While the Butterfly 3's battery capacity is slightly larger, the faster charging speeds give it a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The HTC Butterfly 3 is ideal for users prioritizing performance, a vibrant display, and faster charging. It's a good choice for those who enjoy gaming or demanding apps. The HTC Desire 828 dual sim is better suited for users needing dual SIM capabilities and a more budget-friendly option, accepting compromises in performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the HTC Butterfly 3 worth the extra cost?
If performance and a great display are your priorities, then yes. The Butterfly 3 offers a significantly better user experience than the Desire 828.
❓ Does the Desire 828 have good battery life?
The battery life is decent, but not exceptional. Expect a full day of moderate use, but heavy users may need to charge it before the end of the day.
