The HTC A103 Plus and Oppo A16e represent the lower end of the Android smartphone market, targeting users prioritizing affordability. While both devices share a similar price bracket, they employ different Mediatek chipsets – the MT8768A in the HTC and the MT6762D Helio P22 in the Oppo – leading to distinct performance characteristics. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the best option for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the HTC A103 Plus emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Mediatek MT8768A chipset, while not a powerhouse, features a more balanced core configuration with both faster and slower Cortex-A53 cores, potentially offering a smoother multitasking experience compared to the Oppo A16e’s uniformly clocked Helio P22.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 19 | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 157.9 x 7.9 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.31 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 430 g (15.17 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8768A (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762D Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | - | CPH2421 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 120 EUR |
HTC A103 Plus
- Potentially smoother multitasking due to varied CPU core speeds.
- MT8768A chipset offers a slight architectural advantage.
- May offer better responsiveness in app switching.
- Limited information available on display quality.
- 10W charging is slow.
Oppo A16e
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Potentially slightly better battery life under light loads.
- Affordable price point.
- Uniform CPU core configuration may lead to less responsive multitasking.
- Helio P22 is a basic chipset with limited performance headroom.
Display Comparison
Neither HTC nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like resolution, brightness, or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost reduction. The user experience will likely be similar, with color accuracy and viewing angles being average for this segment. Bezels are expected to be noticeable on both devices.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. However, given the market segment, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. Expect a primary sensor, potentially accompanied by a depth or macro sensor of limited utility. Image processing will be basic, prioritizing speed over quality. The aperture size is likely small on both, resulting in poor low-light performance. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; image quality will likely be similar.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The HTC A103 Plus’s Mediatek MT8768A utilizes an octa-core configuration split into 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This allows for dynamic power allocation – faster cores for demanding tasks, slower cores for background processes. The Oppo A16e’s Helio P22 (MT6762D) employs a uniform octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 setup. While both are 12nm chips, the MT8768A’s architecture *could* translate to better responsiveness in multitasking scenarios. However, the GPU performance is likely comparable, limiting gaming capabilities on both devices. Neither chipset supports advanced features like LPDDR5x RAM, further reinforcing their entry-level positioning.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating a similar charging experience – expect over 2 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the target market, both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The Oppo A16e’s Helio P22, being a less complex chipset, *may* exhibit slightly better power efficiency under light loads, potentially translating to marginally longer battery life for basic usage. However, the difference is unlikely to be significant.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC A103 Plus if you frequently switch between apps or need a device capable of handling slightly more demanding tasks, even if briefly. The more varied CPU core configuration offers a potential edge in responsiveness. Buy the Oppo A16e if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize simplicity and potentially longer battery life due to the less stressed chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A16e struggle with multiple apps open simultaneously?
The Oppo A16e’s Helio P22 chipset, with its uniform Cortex-A53 cores, is likely to exhibit slowdowns when running several apps concurrently. It’s best suited for single-tasking or very light multitasking.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone a significant drawback?
Yes, 10W charging is relatively slow by modern standards. Expect over two hours to fully charge either the HTC A103 Plus or the Oppo A16e. This is typical for phones in this price range, but it requires planning ahead if you need to quickly top up the battery.
❓ Can either of these phones handle popular mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While technically capable of running these games at the lowest settings, the experience will likely be far from optimal. Expect low frame rates, significant lag, and potentially overheating. These phones are not designed for demanding gaming.
