The HTC A103 Plus and Nokia G100 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The A103 Plus relies on Mediatek’s MT8768A, while the Nokia G100 opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 662. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, helping you determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and slightly faster charging, the Nokia G100 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662, built on an 11nm process, offers a modest performance advantage over the A103 Plus’s 12nm Mediatek MT8768A, and the 15W charging is a welcome improvement.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 19 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2022, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 157.9 x 7.9 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.31 in) | 166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 430 g (15.17 oz) | 195.1 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8768A (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0"
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Nordic Blue |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 60 EUR |
HTC A103 Plus
- Potentially lower price point
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Slower processor performance
- Slower 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset
Nokia G100
- More powerful Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Improved image processing capabilities
- May be slightly more expensive
- Potentially less battery life if battery capacity is lower
- Qualcomm’s software update track record can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is impossible. However, given their price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p resolution. The Nokia G100, benefiting from Qualcomm’s image signal processor, *may* offer slightly better color calibration, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a camera comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 662’s image signal processor (ISP) in the Nokia G100 is significantly more capable than the ISP found in the Mediatek MT8768A. This translates to better image processing, improved dynamic range, and potentially superior low-light performance. The Nokia G100 is likely to produce more visually appealing photos, even with similar sensor resolutions. The presence of a dedicated ISP is a key advantage for the G100.
Performance
The Nokia G100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) holds a clear architectural advantage over the HTC A103 Plus’s Mediatek MT8768A (12nm). The smaller 11nm node generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations with similar clock speeds (2.0 GHz for the Kryo 260 Gold vs 2.0 GHz for the Cortex-A53), Qualcomm’s Kryo cores are architecturally more advanced, offering better instructions-per-clock (IPC). This means the G100 will likely exhibit smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. The A103 Plus’s use of older Cortex-A53 cores suggests it will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. However, the Nokia G100’s 15W wired charging is a notable advantage over the HTC A103 Plus’s 10W charging. This means the G100 will reach a full charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity on the A103 Plus could partially offset this, the faster charging speed of the G100 provides a more convenient user experience. The 11nm process of the Snapdragon 662 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC A103 Plus if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a viable option for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Nokia G100 if you prefer a more responsive user experience, slightly better gaming performance, and the convenience of 15W wired charging, even if it comes at a small price premium.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia G100 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. The Mediatek MT8768A in the HTC A103 Plus will struggle with PUBG, even at the lowest settings, due to its less powerful CPU and GPU.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Nokia G100 compared to the HTC A103 Plus?
The Nokia G100’s 15W charging will significantly reduce charging times compared to the HTC A103 Plus’s 10W charging. While exact 0-100% times are unavailable, expect the G100 to charge at least 30-40% faster, offering a more convenient experience.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 offers a noticeable improvement in responsiveness and multitasking compared to the Mediatek MT8768A. App loading times will be faster, and the overall user experience will feel smoother on the Nokia G100.
