The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the HTC A103 Plus and the Infinix Hot 11s NFC aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Infinix prioritizing performance and charging speed, while the HTC focuses on a more basic, streamlined experience. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC is the better choice. Its Helio G88 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the HTC A103 Plus’s MT8768A, and the 18W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the HTC is functional, the Infinix provides a more responsive and convenient user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 19 | 2022, February 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 157.9 x 7.9 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.31 in) | 168.9 x 77 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 430 g (15.17 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8768A (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p | 1440p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Polar Black, Green Wave, Purple |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 230 EUR |
HTC A103 Plus
- Potentially simpler software experience
- Lower price point (likely)
- Basic functionality for essential tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely limited software updates
Infinix Hot 11s NFC
- Faster and more efficient Helio G88 chipset
- 18W fast charging for quicker top-ups
- NFC support for contactless payments
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience can be bloated
- Camera quality is likely average
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on cost optimization over premium display features. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing for the HTC A103 Plus, it's likely a standard IPS LCD. The Infinix Hot 11s NFC also uses an IPS LCD, but the focus is on its size. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO on either device indicates a shared target audience prioritizing functionality over visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests both phones will feature modest camera setups. The Infinix Hot 11s NFC likely benefits from Mediatek’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio G88, potentially offering better image processing capabilities than the MT8768A in the HTC A103 Plus. It’s reasonable to assume the Infinix will deliver slightly better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Hot 11s NFC’s Mediatek Helio G88 (12nm) is a clear upgrade over the HTC A103 Plus’s Mediatek MT8768A (12nm). The Helio G88 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 1.8 GHz, a configuration designed for improved single-core and multi-core performance compared to the A103 Plus’s four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz and four at 1.5 GHz. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Infinix. The A103 Plus will handle basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices likely feature similar battery capacities, given their price points. However, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the HTC A103 Plus’s 10W charging. This faster charging speed dramatically reduces the time spent tethered to a power outlet, making the Infinix more convenient for users on the go. While a larger battery capacity is always desirable, the faster charging of the Infinix effectively mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC A103 Plus if you prioritize simplicity and a minimal software experience, and are willing to sacrifice performance and charging speed. It's a good option for first-time smartphone users or those needing a basic communication device. Buy the Infinix Hot 11s NFC if you want a more capable device for everyday tasks, light gaming, and appreciate the convenience of faster charging and NFC functionality. It’s ideal for users who want more from their budget smartphone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Hot 11s NFC handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Helio G88 in the Infinix Hot 11s NFC is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to use lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The MT8768A in the HTC A103 Plus will struggle with these titles, offering a significantly less enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Does the Infinix Hot 11s NFC support Google Pay or other NFC-based payment services?
Yes, the 'NFC' in the name indicates that the Infinix Hot 11s NFC includes NFC functionality, allowing you to use it with Google Pay and other contactless payment services. The HTC A103 Plus does not have NFC.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With its 18W charging, the Infinix Hot 11s NFC should fully charge in approximately 2-3 hours. The HTC A103 Plus, with its 10W charging, will likely take 4-5 hours to reach 100%.
❓ Is the software on either phone heavily customized with bloatware?
Infinix phones are known for including some pre-installed apps (bloatware). While the HTC A103 Plus may have less bloatware, it's likely to receive fewer software updates and security patches over time.
