HTC 10 evo vs Google Pixel 3: A Detailed Comparison of Two Android Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 3 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 845 chipset delivers significantly faster performance and improved efficiency compared to the HTC 10 evo’s Snapdragon 810. While the 10 evo boasts respectable battery endurance, the Pixel 3’s superior processing power and software optimization make it the more compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | HTC 10 evo | Google Pixel 3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat16 1024/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2016, November. Released 2016, November | 2018, October 09. Released 2018, October 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 153.6 x 77.3 x 8.1 mm (6.05 x 3.04 x 0.32 in) | 145.6 x 68.2 x 7.9 mm (5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 148 g (5.22 oz) |
| IP57 dust/water resistant (up to 1m. and 30 mins) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2560 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~534 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~443 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~70.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 76.7 cm2 (~77.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super LCD3 | P-OLED, HDR |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A57) | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 430 | Adreno 630 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, PDAF, OIS | 12.2 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 4K@30fps (24-bit/192kHz audio), 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 19mm (ultrawide), no AF |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.4 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, QC2 | 18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless |
| Stand-by | Up to 480 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 23 h (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 3200 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 2915 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver, Black | Clearly White, Just Black, Not Pink |
| Models | 10 evo, M10f, 2PYB2 | G013A |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 450 EUR |
| SAR | 0.60 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.51 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -71.7dB / Crosstalk -70.1dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 58h | Endurance rating 69h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1357:1 (nominal), 2.407 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 4.350 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 65dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 80dB | Voice 77dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 81dB |
| Performance | GFXBench: 6.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 285044 (v7) GeekBench: 8337 (v4.4) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
HTC 10 evo
- Longer battery endurance rating (58h)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Quick Charge 2.0 support
- Older Snapdragon 810 chipset
- Lower display contrast ratio
- No wireless charging
Google Pixel 3
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 845 chipset
- Superior display contrast and clarity
- Wireless charging with PD2.0
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating (69h)
- Potentially higher price (depending on current market)
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 3’s display boasts a significant advantage in contrast, reporting an 'Infinite' nominal ratio and 4.350 in sunlight, compared to the HTC 10 evo’s 1357:1 nominal and 2.407 in sunlight. This translates to deeper blacks and more vibrant colors on the Pixel 3, particularly noticeable in HDR content. While both displays offer adequate visibility outdoors, the Pixel 3’s higher contrast ratio provides a clearer image in direct sunlight. The Pixel 3’s panel technology is also likely superior, though specifics aren’t provided, offering a more premium viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Pixel 3 is widely regarded as having a superior camera system. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Snapdragon 845’s image signal processor, delivers exceptional image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 3’s image processing excels in dynamic range and detail preservation. The HTC 10 evo’s camera, while competent, lacks the software sophistication of the Pixel 3, resulting in less consistent results.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Google Pixel 3’s Snapdragon 845, built on a 10nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance and efficiency over the HTC 10 evo’s Snapdragon 810 (20nm). The 845’s Kryo 385 cores (2.5 GHz Gold & 1.6 GHz Silver) deliver faster processing speeds and improved multi-tasking capabilities. The 810’s Cortex-A53/A57 configuration, while capable, struggles to keep pace with the 845, especially in demanding applications and games. This difference is further compounded by the 845’s more efficient architecture, resulting in less thermal throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 3 edges out the HTC 10 evo in battery endurance, achieving a rating of 69 hours versus the 10 evo’s 58 hours. However, this difference isn’t solely due to battery capacity. The Snapdragon 845’s improved power efficiency plays a crucial role. Both phones support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 3 adds the convenience of wireless charging with PD2.0, a feature absent on the 10 evo. While the 10 evo’s QC2 charging is fast, the Pixel 3’s wireless charging offers added flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the HTC 10 evo if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s a good option for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and media consumption. Buy the Google Pixel 3 if you demand snappy performance, a class-leading camera experience, and guaranteed software updates. It’s ideal for power users, photographers, and those who value a clean Android experience.