The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X9a and Oppo Reno8 T 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer 5G connectivity and attractive designs, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G edges out the Honor X9a thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging and potentially better camera software optimization. While both share the same Snapdragon 695 chipset, the Reno8 T 5G's charging speed provides a noticeable advantage in daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 06 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5100 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | RMO-NX1 | CPH2505 |
| Price | $ 212.08 | About 340 EUR |
Honor X9a
- Large Curved AMOLED Display
- Potentially Durable Build
- Competitive Price
- Slower Charging (40W)
- Camera Software May Lag
- LCD Panel likely on Reno8 T 5G
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Fast 67W Charging
- Potentially Better Camera Software
- Sleek Design
- Reverse Wired Charging
- LCD Panel (potentially less vibrant)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Curved display may be less durable
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch display, but the Honor X9a boasts a curved AMOLED panel, potentially offering a more immersive viewing experience and vibrant colors. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G likely uses an LCD panel, which may have slightly less vibrant colors but potentially better outdoor visibility. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor around 64MP, Oppo often excels in camera software processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Honor X9a might offer a slightly different color profile. Detailed camera tests are needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Sharing the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, expect similar performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and RAM management. Both should handle multitasking well.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Honor X9a's 40W charging. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the Reno8 T 5G will charge much quicker.
Buying Guide
The Honor X9a is a good choice for users prioritizing a large, curved display and a potentially more durable build (often Honor emphasizes this). The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for those who value fast charging, a potentially more refined camera experience, and a sleeker design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have similar battery capacities, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's faster charging means it will spend less time plugged in.
❓ Is the Honor X9a's curved display worth it?
The curved display offers a more immersive viewing experience, but it can also be less durable and may introduce accidental touches. It's a matter of personal preference.
