The Honor X9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different priorities. The Honor X9 focuses on a streamlined experience with efficient power management, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emphasizes 5G connectivity and faster charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance edge and 5G support, while its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Honor X9 remains a compelling option for those on a tighter budget or who don't require 5G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 31 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 230 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X9
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for good battery life.
- 66W fast charging provides decent top-up speeds.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Lacks 5G connectivity, limiting future-proofing.
- Performance may feel slower compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support.
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset for smoother performance.
- Battery life is comparable to the Honor X9 despite faster charging.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Honor X9.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Honor X9 (brightness data unavailable). While both feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor visibility. The absence of refresh rate data for the Honor X9 suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s display technology isn’t specified, but is likely 60Hz or 90Hz. This impacts smoothness during scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s market positioning suggests a more robust camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The absence of details on optical image stabilization (OIS) for either device suggests it’s unlikely to be present, potentially impacting low-light performance. Focusing on the main sensor specs would be crucial for a more accurate comparison, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely has an edge due to its overall market segment.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor X9 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 695, with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the X9’s 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores, offers a more modern architecture and 5G capabilities. While the X9’s cores clock slightly higher, the 695’s architecture and additional cores (6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver vs 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) provide a more balanced and generally faster experience, particularly in multi-threaded tasks. The 5G modem in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Honor X9 supports 66W wired charging, reaching 81% in 30 minutes. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G offers 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support, achieving 50% in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. This faster charging speed is a major advantage for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X9 if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on efficient power usage and a smooth, if not blazing-fast, experience. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster downloads and streaming, and value the convenience of significantly faster charging – crucial for users who are constantly on the go and need to top up quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a flagship gaming chip, its architecture provides a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680, allowing for playable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense firefights.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 66W charging on the Honor X9 in real-world use?
While the wattage is similar, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s charging is demonstrably faster. It reaches 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Honor X9 takes 30 minutes to reach 81%. This translates to a significantly shorter overall charging time, making the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G more convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Honor X9 a significant drawback in 2024?
The impact of lacking 5G depends on your location and usage. If 5G coverage is limited in your area, or you primarily use Wi-Fi, it’s less of a concern. However, 5G is becoming increasingly prevalent, and the Honor X9 will be unable to take advantage of faster data speeds as 5G networks expand.
