The Honor X9 and Oppo Reno8 T 5G both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different philosophies. The Honor X9 prioritizes a balance of efficiency and fast charging with the Snapdragon 680, while the Oppo Reno8 T 5G aims for a performance boost with the 5G-enabled Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable uplift in processing power and 5G connectivity, while the 67W charging, despite taking slightly longer to fully charge, provides a more versatile charging experience with PD support.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 31 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | - | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Honor X9
- Extremely fast initial charging speed (66W)
- Potentially better battery life due to less demanding chipset
- Competitive price point
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Older chipset architecture
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- PD support for versatile charging
- Slightly slower full charge time compared to Honor X9
- Potentially lower battery life due to more powerful processor
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display, focusing on value rather than bleeding-edge technology. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points. The key difference lies in the chipsets powering the displays; the Snapdragon 695 in the Reno8 T 5G has a slightly more powerful ISP which *could* translate to better image processing for display output. However, without direct comparison, this remains speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior ISP in the Oppo Reno8 T 5G provides a processing advantage. It’s reasonable to assume Oppo’s image processing algorithms will benefit from this, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography. The focus should be on the main sensor resolution and aperture; any 2MP macro or depth sensors are likely to offer minimal real-world benefit.
Performance
The core difference here is the chipset. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represents a clear upgrade over the Honor X9’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The 695 features a Kryo 660 CPU with 2x2.2 GHz performance cores and 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores, compared to the 680’s 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. This translates to approximately 15-20% faster CPU performance in benchmarks, and a significantly more capable Adreno 619 GPU versus the Adreno 610 in the X9. Crucially, the 695 adds 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the X9. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural improvements in the 695 yield better overall performance.
Battery Life
Both phones feature fast charging, but with different implementations. The Honor X9’s 66W charging claims an 81% charge in 30 minutes, suggesting a full charge takes around 45-50 minutes. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s 67W charging with PD (Power Delivery) completes a full charge in 44 minutes. While the Honor X9 charges slightly faster initially, the Reno8 T 5G’s PD support offers greater compatibility with a wider range of chargers and accessories. Battery capacity is not specified, but the Snapdragon 695’s improved efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size in the Reno8 T 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X9 if you need a reliable daily driver with exceptionally fast charging (66W) and prioritize battery life over raw processing power. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G if you prefer a more responsive experience for multitasking, light gaming, and future-proofing with 5G connectivity. This phone is better suited for users who want a bit more performance headroom and appreciate the convenience of Power Delivery charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno8 T 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X9, allowing for smoother gameplay and reduced lag, especially in more intense scenes.
❓ Does the Honor X9's 66W charging degrade the battery health faster than the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging?
Charging speed alone doesn't directly correlate to battery degradation. Both phones employ charging management systems to mitigate heat and optimize charging cycles. However, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G’s PD support allows for more flexible charging options, potentially using lower wattage chargers to prolong battery lifespan.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo Reno8 T 5G worth the extra cost if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
If 5G coverage is currently unavailable, the immediate benefit is limited. However, purchasing the Reno8 T 5G future-proofs your device for when 5G networks expand. It also generally offers improved 4G LTE performance compared to the Honor X9 due to the more modern modem.
