Honor continues to deliver compelling mid-range smartphones, and the X9 5G and Honor 70 are prime examples. Both offer attractive designs and competitive features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor 70 generally edges out the X9 5G thanks to its superior Snapdragon 778G+ chipset, brighter display, and slightly faster charging. However, the X9 5G might be a better value proposition for budget-conscious buyers seeking 5G connectivity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 29 | Available. Released 2022, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF
50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver |
| Models | ANY-NX1 | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
Honor X9 5G
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- 66W fast charging
- Large display
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially less impressive camera
Honor 70
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G+ chipset
- Brighter display
- Potentially better camera
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Higher price
- Slightly slower charging (percentage reached)
Display Comparison
The Honor 70 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 790 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the X9 5G's display is adequate, it lacks the same level of vibrancy and outdoor usability. The Honor 70's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and image depth, further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Honor 70 is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The 778G+ chipset often includes better ISP (Image Signal Processor) capabilities, leading to improved processing and detail. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison, but the chipset advantage favors the Honor 70.
Performance
The Honor 70's Snapdragon 778G+ 5G chipset is noticeably more powerful than the X9 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The 778G+’s architecture with its Cortex-A78 cores provides a significant performance boost over the X9 5G’s Kryo 660 cores.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life, with the Honor 70 claiming an endurance rating of 100 hours. The X9 5G's battery capacity is likely similar, suggesting comparable real-world usage. The Honor 70's 66W charging is slightly faster, reaching 60% in 20 minutes, compared to the X9 5G's 66W charging reaching 81% in 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Honor X9 5G is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and 5G connectivity without needing top-tier performance. The Honor 70 is a better choice for those who value a smoother experience, a brighter display, and a more capable camera system, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor 70 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance, a brighter display, and a better camera, the Honor 70 is worth the investment. However, if you're on a tighter budget and primarily need 5G connectivity, the X9 5G offers good value.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Honor 70, with its Snapdragon 778G+ chipset, will provide a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience compared to the Honor X9 5G.
