The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G and Honor X8 represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches: the Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and rapid charging, while the Honor X8 focuses on a streamlined experience with a more power-efficient chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just over 40 minutes. While the Honor X8 provides solid efficiency, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s added features justify the slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 11 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Midnight Black, Ocean Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | TFY-LX1, TFY-LX2, TFY-LX3 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X8
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Sleek and lightweight design (assumed based on brand positioning)
- Competitive price point
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Significantly slower 22.5W charging
- Potentially lower performance in demanding tasks
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset with 5G support
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the Honor X8
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price points, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency over visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are absent. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) indicates that both phones will likely struggle in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and fixed focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a higher clock speed for its prime core (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the X8’s Snapdragon 680). The 695 also includes 5G modem capabilities, a significant advantage for future network compatibility. While the X8’s Snapdragon 680 is efficient, the 695’s Kryo 660 cores offer a performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads. The X8's 4x Kryo 265 Gold cores are clocked slightly higher, but the 695's overall architecture and 5G capabilities provide a more substantial benefit for power users.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery performance despite the lack of specific mAh ratings. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging is a massive advantage. It can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Honor X8’s 22.5W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to fully replenish the battery. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts the user experience, especially for those who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X8 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a consistently smooth experience for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and calls, and 5G connectivity isn't a necessity. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, require 5G connectivity for future-proofing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means slightly shorter battery life between charges.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, it's not a flagship processor. Expect some degree of heat buildup during prolonged gaming. However, Xiaomi typically implements thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling, ensuring a reasonably stable gaming experience. The Honor X8's Snapdragon 680 will likely run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compatible with all USB-C chargers, or do I need a specific one?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G supports PD3.0 and QC3 standards, meaning it's compatible with a wide range of USB-C chargers. However, to achieve the full 67W charging speed, you'll need a charger that specifically supports these protocols. Using a standard USB-C charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ How does the 5G connectivity of the Poco X4 Pro 5G impact battery life compared to the 4G-only Honor X8?
Actively using 5G will generally consume more battery than 4G due to the increased data transfer speeds and network searching. However, if you're in an area with limited 5G coverage, the phone will often fall back to 4G, minimizing the battery impact. The Poco X4 Pro 5G's larger battery and efficient chipset help mitigate the increased power draw of 5G.
