Both the Honor X8 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. However, they approach it with different philosophies. The Honor prioritizes affordability, while the Xiaomi aims for a more well-rounded experience with faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Honor X8 5G’s Snapdragon 480+, and the blazing-fast 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Honor is cheaper, the Xiaomi’s advantages justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 25 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 15 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (VNE-N41 only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Ocean Blue | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | VNE-N41 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X8 5G
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Slower Snapdragon 480+ processor
- Significantly slower 22.5W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Brighter 746 nit display
- Higher price than the Honor X8 5G
- Battery life is similar to the Honor despite faster charging
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Honor X8 5G, whose peak brightness isn't specified but is likely lower given its chipset and price point. While both have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the Redmi’s higher brightness makes it the more usable display in bright conditions. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., LTPO) are absent for both, suggesting standard refresh rate panels are used.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, being a higher-tier device, likely features a more capable primary sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, and users shouldn't expect flagship-level image quality. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represents a clear step up from the Honor X8 5G’s Snapdragon 480+ (8nm). The 6nm process node generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance. The CPU configuration also favors the Redmi, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the Honor’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 cores. While both have octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Kryo 660 cores provide a tangible performance benefit, especially in sustained workloads. The Redmi will handle demanding apps and games more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Honor X8 5G lacking specific battery capacity information. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer, delivering a 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. The Honor X8 5G’s 22.5W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to reach full capacity. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for the Redmi.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X8 5G if your primary concern is minimizing upfront cost and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if you want a phone that can be quickly topped up with its 67W charging – ideal for power users and those frequently on the go.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable mid-range chipset, but Genshin Impact will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. Expect playable frame rates at medium settings, but don't anticipate a flagship-level gaming experience. The Honor X8 5G's Snapdragon 480+ would struggle even more with this title.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 22.5W charging on the Honor X8 5G in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is dramatically faster. It can reach 100% charge in approximately 42 minutes, while the Honor X8 5G will likely take well over 1.5 hours to fully charge. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
While not explicitly stated in the provided specs, the Snapdragon 695 generally supports carrier aggregation, which can significantly improve 5G download and upload speeds in areas with good network coverage. This is a potential advantage over the Snapdragon 480+ in the Honor X8 5G, which may have limited carrier aggregation support.
